Comparative Analysis Of Outcomes Of Lenticule Extraction Using Smile Pro Under General Anesthesia
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP22.03 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/sdww-w704
Authors: Dr Tatiana Shilova* 1 , Dr Maria Shilova 1
1Doctor's Shilova Clinic,Moscow,Russian Federation
Purpose
To evaluate the feasibility of performing SMILE Pro laser vision correction in patients for whom correction under topical/local anesthesia was not possible; to refine technical approaches for safe and comfortable surgery; to compare refractive outcomes with a control group; and to assess the effect of exclusive surgeon control of positioning throughout the procedure.
Setting
Russia, Moscow, Doctor’s Shilova Clinic
Methods
Group 1 included 52 eyes after bilateral SMILE Pro under general anesthesia. Surgery with topical anesthesia was impossible. Myopia ranged from −1.00 to −8.5 D, mean astigmatism 1.45 D. Procedures were performed using fractionated administration of propofol 200-400 ml with monitoring of blood pressure,heart rate,oxygen saturation,humidified oxygen delivery (3–4 L/min).
The control Group 2 consisted of 60 eyes was comparable by age and mean ametropia parameters.
During docking, laser stages, and lenticule dissection, proprietary instruments and positioning-control techniques were used. At 1 and 3 months postoperatively, statistical analysis was performed for uncorrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, and higher-order aberrations.
Results
Mean visual acuity on postoperative day 1 in Group 1 was 0.95 versus 1.15 in Group 2. Subjectively, patients in Group 1 were satisfied with the result.
At 1 and 3 months, no statistically significant differences were found in outcomes, including the percentage of eyes achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 (20/20) or better and the mean spherical equivalent refraction. Higher-order aberrations, spherical aberration were comparable in both groups.
Comparative assessment of corneal topography after SMILE under general anesthesia versus SMILE under topical/local anesthesia revealed no substantial differences.
Conclusions
SMILE Pro under general anesthesia makes it possible to achieve high refractive outcomes in patients who cannot undergo the procedure under topical/local anesthesia. However, it requires appropriate anesthesia management and a high level of manual surgical skills.