Benefits Of In-House Lens Finishing In A Military Social Ophthalmology Practice : A Two-Year Observational Study
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: POSUS008 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/ckp4-9m26
Authors: Dr Imane Jeddou* 1 , Dr Aissam Fiqhi 1 , Dr Charaf Bouabbadi 1 , A/Prof. Yassine Mouzari 1
1HMIMV,Rabat,Morocco
Purpose
The purpose of our study is to evaluate access, efficiency, optical quality, patient-centered benefits, and the economic impact of implementing in-house lens finishing within an ophthalmology practice operating under military social services. Primary endpoints were turnaround time, objective visual outcomes, patient satisfaction, and referral inflow. Secondary endpoints included reductions in out-of-pocket expenses and operational advantages for active-duty personnel, retirees, and school-aged children when clinical and optical services are co-located.
Setting
An ophthalmology practice within the Royal Moroccan Armed Forces' Social Action branch, located in a neighboring city, a one-hour drive from the nearest Military Hospital, and contracted with the military mutual insurance. A single ophthalmologist practice with an adjacent on-site optical bench serving 200 to 300 patients per month with high retention and frequent patient referrals. The ophthalmologist and optician traveled from the hospital to the center, bringing care closer to beneficiaries.
Methods
This is a descriptive, two-year observational study of routine workflow and outcomes after center inauguration. All patients received a full ophthalmic consultation (history, clinical exam, intraocular pressure, fundoscopy), followed, when indicated, by same-site spectacle production. The optician used a tracer, blocker, and lens edger to cut, finish, and mount lenses. Data collected included monthly volume, referral sources, time between prescription and delivery, rates of rework or remount, postoperative visual acuity, and patient satisfaction surveys. Financial data recorded included mutual insurance coverage and patient co-payment differentials. Team coordination and quality-control steps were documented.
Results
The co-located model substantially shortened prescription-to-delivery intervals. Close ophthalmologist-optician collaboration and in-line equipment (tracer, blocker, edger) enabled oversight of each production step, yielding very high objective visual outcomes, low rework and remount rates, and strong patient satisfaction. The facility sustained robust patient retention and a notable influx of new referrals. The Military mutual insurance convention significantly lowered patient direct costs. Operational benefits included reduced absenteeism for active-duty personnel, rapid correction for schoolchildren, and streamlined follow-up for retirees.
Conclusions
In-house lens finishing within a conventioned military social ophthalmology center improves access, shortens turnaround, enhances optical outcomes, and reduces patient costs. Coordinated ophthalmologist-optician workflows with on-site finishing produced high visual outcomes and low remount rates while improving patient retention and operational efficiency. This model may be a scalable approach to streamline refractive care and increase patient-centered efficiency in similar health-service settings.