A Clinical Decision Algorithm Based On Multimodal Corneal And Visual Quality Assessment For Refractive Laser Eligibility Screening
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: POREF203 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/6xdt-cz95
Authors: Dr Ayse Ozpinar* 1
1Department of Ophthalmology,Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine,Istanbul ,Türkiye
Purpose
To develop and preliminarily evaluate a structured clinical decision algorithm for refractive laser eligibility screening integrating multimodal corneal safety assessment and visual quality parameters.
Setting
Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
Methods
In this retrospective study, we reviewed consecutive patients undergoing refractive laser eligibility screening and applied a rule-based clinical decision algorithm. The algorithm incorporated corneal tomography parameters (BAD-D, thinnest corneal thickness, keratometry), refractive error, estimated ablation depth, and visual quality factors. Procedure-specific safety thresholds (residual stromal bed, ablation ratio) were applied according to surgical technique. Each eye was analyzed independently and classified as suitable, conditional, or not suitable. Algorithm classifications were compared with clinician decisions, with subgroup analysis in operated eyes.
Results
Eighty eyes from 40 consecutive patients were analyzed. The algorithm classified 61 eyes (76.3%) as suitable, 11 (13.8%) as conditional, and 8 (10.0%) as not suitable. Overall agreement was 67.5%. In the surgical subgroup (32 eyes), agreement increased to 90.6%, with 29 categorized as suitable and two as conditional. One operated eye was classified as not suitable due to residual stromal bed and ablation depth thresholds. Disagreements mainly occurred between the suitable and conditional categories, reflecting conservative safety limits or additional clinical factors not incorporated into the model.
Conclusions
This structured, multimodal decision algorithm demonstrated strong agreement with clinician-based surgical decisions in operated cases and provided systematic risk stratification during refractive laser eligibility screening. The model was designed to integrate both structural and visual quality parameters within a unified decision framework. It may support safer and more standardized refractive laser assessment. Prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted.