ESCRS - POCOR551 - Ai-Driven Analysis Of Ocular Surface & Tear Biomarkers.

Ai-Driven Analysis Of Ocular Surface & Tear Biomarkers.

Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: POCOR551 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/f2v5-r921

Authors: Dr Prabhjot Singh* 1 , Dr Rohit Shetty 2 , Dr Abhijeet Roy 3 , Dr Arkasubhra Ghosh 4

1Cornea and Refractive surgery,Narayana Nethralaya,Bangalore,India, 2Refractive Surgery,Narayana Nethralaya,Bangalore,India, 3Imaging, Biomechanics and Mathematical Modelling Solutions Lab,Narayana Nethralaya,Bangalore,India, 4GROW Research Laboratory,Narayana Nethralaya,Bangalore,India

Purpose

To develop and validate an AI-integrated biomarker scoring system as a surrogate for ocular surface health and inflammation, comparing its performance against standard dry eye diagnostics.

Setting

Prospective cross-sectional study conducted at Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India, in collaboration with the Imaging, Biomechanics and Mathematical Modelling Solutions (IBMS) Lab, GROW Research Lab, between January 2024 and January 2026. Patients were recruited from the dry eye outpatient clinic.

Methods

2000 patients (1115 subclinical, 885 dry eye) underwent Schirmer’s, TBUT, Meibography, epithelial mapping and confocal microscopy for dendritic cell metrics. Tear biomarkers (via BioM Pathfinder) were integrated using AI to generate a composite score (0–1): healthy (0–0.3), subclinical (0.3–0.7), and dry eye (0.7–1), correlated with HOAs and ocular surface changes.

Results

Patients with AI scores above 0.7 showed clear signs of dry eye—higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers, more dendritic cells, uneven epithelium and increased HOAs, all statistically significant (p<0.05). The AI system was able to accurately group patients into healthy, subclinical, and dry eye categories.

Conclusions

Patients with AI scores above 0.7 showed clear signs of dry eye—higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers, more dendritic cells, uneven epithelium and increased HOAs, all statistically significant (p<0.05). The AI system was able to accurately group patients into healthy, subclinical, and dry eye categories.