Early Changes In Eyes Of Keratoconus Patients
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: POCOR395 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/ya4m-z985
Authors: Dr Aliyeva Sidiga* 1 , Dr Sidiga Aliyeva 2
1National Centre of Ophthalmology named after acad. Zarifa Aliyeva, Baku, Azerbaijan,National Centre of Ophthalmology named after acad. Zarifa Aliyeva, Baku, Azerbaijan,Baku,Azerbaijan, 2National Centre of Ophthalmology named after acad. Zarifa Aliyeva, Baku, Azerbaijan,National Centre of Ophthalmology named after acad. Zarifa Aliyeva, Baku, Azerbaijan,Baku ,Azerbaijan
Purpose
To identify variables best suited to detecting keratoconus beforemanifestation of ectatic changes and showing disease progression in the very earlystage
Setting
National Centre of Ophthalmology named after acad. Zarifa Aliyeva, Baku, Azerbaijan
Methods
27 patients with diagnosed unilateral keratoconus were followed up for theirfellow eye, which had not yet shown any ectactic changes, to determine initial changeindicators towards keratoconus disease. Variables were compared to 50 normal eyeswithout any known disease. A following receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC)analysis was performed to reveal the variables best used to discriminate healthy eyesfrom early ectatic eyes.
Results
Calculated mean difference of the cylinder for TCRP (total corneal refractivepower) was only 0.07D ± 0.32 for CA (anterior astigmatism) = 0.12D ± 0.28, CB(posterior astigmatism) = 0.02D ± 0.1. (ROC) revealed the index of height decentration(IHD) with an area under the curve of 0.788 ± 0.054 as the most suitable todifferentiate between healthy and afflicted eyes, followed by the index of verticalasymmetry (IVA) = 0.772 ± 0.057 and keratoconus index (KI) = 0.743 ± 0.062. Withprogression of the eyes into early ectactic stages the ROC, however, showed thehighest area under the curve for D-index = 0.876 ± 0.039, followed by IHD = 0.855 ±0.046 and IVA = 0.842 ± 0.046.
Conclusions
Early stages of keratoconus are hard to diagnose, best results can beachieved by using IHD and IVA. As the disease progresses, D-index is better suited todiagnose an ectasia. Astigmatism, keratometry and pachymetry barely change in theearly stages so these values are not as fitting as corneal elevation parameters for earlydiagnosis.