ESCRS - POCOR385 - High-Altitude Residence And Keratoconus: A Scoping Review

High-Altitude Residence And Keratoconus: A Scoping Review

Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: POCOR385 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/s8cb-e924

Authors: Raul H Plasencia Salini* 1 , Aileen Arevalo 2 , Justo Luis Noriega Martinez 3 , Silva Alejandro 4 , Simon Fung 5

1Universidad de San Martín de Porres,Lima ,Peru;CorneaClinic ,Trujillo,Peru, 2Ophthalmology,New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai,New York ,United States, 3CorneaClinic,Trujillo,Peru, 4Clinica La Luz ,Lima ,Peru, 5Ophthalmology,University of California San Francisco,San Francisco ,United States

Purpose

To evaluate the association between high-altitude residence and keratoconus (KC) burden and to assess its implications for the screening of refractive surgery candidates.

Setting

Scoping review of population-based and clinical studies evaluating keratoconus burden in populations residing at high-altitude regions.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception through February 1, 2026. Studies evaluating the burden of keratoconus among populations residing in high-altitude regions were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction.

Results

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, results indicate a higher burden of keratoconus in high-altitude regions. In Saudi Arabia, KC prevalence was highest in mountainous areas (0.0122%) and lowest along the coast (0.0014%). In the United States, the highest prevalence was reported in Colorado (0.51%; 95% CI, 0.49–0.52), a high-altitude state. An Israeli population study found KC incidence increased progressively with altitude, with significantly higher rates above 500 meters than at lower elevations (p < 0.05). Among refractive surgery candidates at high altitudes, prevalence was higher (8.6%–18.7%), and one retrospective study showed significantly higher rates in a high-altitude city compared with coastal regions (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

High-altitude residence has been proposed as a potential factor influencing the burden of keratoconus, although evidence remains limited. While a definitive relationship cannot be established, the available literature suggests that geographic altitude should be considered in keratoconus screening and in the preoperative assessment of refractive surgery candidates living in high-altitude areas. Further well-designed, population-based studies using standardized diagnostic criteria are needed to better characterize this potential association and to clarify underlying mechanisms.