Comparative Evaluation Of Visual Outcomes And Photic Phenomena Following Implantation Of Enhanced Monofocal Tecnis Eyhance Versus Bausch+Lomb Envista And Acrysof Iq Intraocular Lenses In Routine Cataract Surgery
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: POCAT450 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/j9q0-mb12
Authors: Dr ATHANASIOS VACHTSEVANOS* 1 , Dr EFTHIMIA KARAKOSTA 1 , DIMITRIOS NANAS 2 , NIKOLAOS NANOS 3
1OPSIS OPHTHALMOLOGY INSTITUTE,KOZANI,Greece, 2NANASVISION PRIVATE PRACTICE,THESSALONIKI,Greece, 3GENERAL HOSPITAL,KASTORIA,Greece
Purpose
To compare visual and subjective outcomes following implantation of TECNIS Eyhance, Bausch + Lomb enVista monofocal, and AcrySof IQ intraocular lenses (IOLs) in routine cataract surgery
Setting
OPSIS OPHTHALMOLOGY INSTITUTE
Methods
Prospective comparative study including 110 eyes undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification. Eyes were allocated into three groups: Eyhance (n=38), enVista (n=36), and AcrySof IQ (n=36). Primary outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE). Secondary outcomes included glare, halos, and dry eye symptoms. Outcomes were assessed at 3 months postoperatively. ANOVA and chi-square tests were used for analysis.
Results
UDVA and CDVA were comparable among groups (p>0.05). Mean UDVA (logMAR) was 0.05±0.07 (Eyhance), 0.07±0.08 (enVista), and 0.08±0.09 (AcrySof IQ). UNVA was significantly better in the Eyhance group (0.28±0.09 logMAR) compared with enVista (0.38±0.10) and AcrySof IQ (0.41±0.11) (p<0.01). MRSE was similar across groups. Incidence of glare, halos, and dry eye symptoms did not differ significantly.
Conclusions
TECNIS Eyhance provides improved near functional performance while maintaining equivalent distance acuity and refractive predictability compared to conventional monofocal IOLs.