Standardised Comparison Of Two Intraocular Lenses : Tecnis Puresee (J&J) And Zoe (Ophtalmolmopro)
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: POCAT425 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/q4zd-8a98
Authors: Dr Loic Dambricourt* 1 , Dr Julien Combes 1
1Centre Monticelli Paradis Clinique Juge,Marseille,France
Purpose
To evaluate in a standardised manner the visual results after implantation of TECNIS Puresee (Johnson&Johnson, USA) and ZOE (OphtalmoPro, Saint-Ingbert, Germany)
Setting
Retrospective single-centre study including 20 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery and were implanted with a TECNIS PureSee IOL (10 patients) or a ZOE IOL (10 patients) with a 3-month post-operative assessment
Methods
A 3-month post-operative assessment according to ESCRS recommended standards: standardised measurement of visual acuity (Qvision Vision C ) without correction and with distance correction (3.5 m corrected to infinity), intermediate vision (66 cm) and near vision (40 cm), monocular and binocular defocus curves with distance correction from +1.5D to -3.5D, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (Qvision CSF application)
Results
Results in progress. Preliminary results for ZOE (10 patients): average UDVA of 0.02 +/- 0.1 Logmar, average UIVA of 0.10 +/- 0.12 Logmar, average UNVA of 0.35 +/- 0.12 Logmar. Comparisons: visual acuity, depth of field and defocus profile, contrast vision in photopic and mesopic conditions.
Conclusions
Conclusion currently being analysed: Good efficacy, safety and satisfaction for both implants. Defocus profile for Zoe according to ESCRS classification to be confirmed: Partial range of fied - Enhance. Defocus profile for the pure see not available yet.