ESCRS - POCAT242 - To Compare The Influence Of Surgeon Hand Dominance On Surgically Induced Astigmatism In Phacoemulsification.

To Compare The Influence Of Surgeon Hand Dominance On Surgically Induced Astigmatism In Phacoemulsification.

Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: POCAT242 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/r6kk-pc08

Authors: Dr Laiba Asif Mazhry 1 , Dr Muhammad Abdullah Mazhry 2 , A/Prof. Zia ul Mazhry* 3

1Mughal Eye Hospital Trust,Lahore,Pakistan, 2LRBT Township,Lahore,Pakistan, 3Wapda Teaching Hospital Complex,Lahore,Pakistan

Purpose

To compare the influence of surgeon hand dominance on surgically induced astigmatism in

Phacoemulsification.

Setting

Acuity Eye Center, Lahore, from 2023 to 2024.

Methods

SIA was analyzed in 200 patients who underwent phacoemulsification performed by a single experienced surgeon using a temporal clear corneal incision. The surgeon operated on right eyes using the right dominant hand and on left eyes using the left non-dominant hand. Preoperative keratometric (K) values were recorded one day before surgery using a Nidek auto-refractokeratometer. Postoperative keratometric readings were obtained at 6 weeks follow-up. Pre- and postoperative K values were entered into a spreadsheet, and SIA was calculated using the ASCRS SIA Calculator. Comparison of SIA between dominant-hand and non-dominant-hand phacoemulsification was performed using SPSS software version 26.

Results

All the participants were between 30 to 80 years of age. Double angle plot for SIA using ASCRS V100

tool revealed significant insights into the astigmatic changes post-surgery in both the right and left eyes. The

centroid values, indicative of the mean astigmatic change, were 0.49±0.26D and 0.55±0.31D, respectively. The

comparison between both left and right phacoemulsification showed that the difference was non-significant

between dominant and non-dominant hand (P=0.251)

Conclusions

Despite the challenges of adapting surgical technique to accommodate hand dominance, our

findings indicate a non-significant difference in postoperative SIA outcomes.