The 320° Challenge: Tunnel Depth Predictability In Long-Arc Intracorneal Ring Segments — Manual Versus Femtosecond Laser
Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: FP30.04 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/z6jj-nw12
Authors: Dr Maria Vitória Vicente Vitória Vicente Cardoso* 1 , Dr Marcelo Mastromonico Lui 1 , Dr Luciano Rabello Netto Cirillo 1
1Ophthalmology,Hospital de Olhos CRO Guarulhos,Guarulhos,Brazil
Purpose
To evaluate the predictability of intrastromal tunnel depth for implantation of long-arc intracorneal ring segments (320°), comparing manual dissection and femtosecond laser-assisted techniques in patients with keratoconus.
Setting
Tertiary referral ophthalmology center.
Methods
This prospective study included 89 eyes of patients with keratoconus who underwent implantation of intracorneal ring segments with a 320° arc length. Tunnel creation was performed by manual dissection (45 eyes) or with femtosecond laser assistance (44 eyes). Planned tunnel depth was defined preoperatively as a fixed percentage of corneal thickness (80% for the manual technique and 70% for the laser-assisted technique) and was considered constant along the entire arc of the segment. Tunnel depth was assessed six months postoperatively using swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography, with measurements at nasal, temporal, and inferior points. Relative and absolute deltas between planned and achieved depths were calculated.
Results
The femtosecond group demonstrated a smaller difference between planned and achieved tunnel depth, as well as lower variability of measurements, consistently across all evaluated points along the 320° intracorneal ring segment arc.
Conclusions
The femtosecond laser-assisted approach showed superior tunnel depth predictability, indicating enhanced surgical control and reproducibility in long-arc intracorneal ring implantation relative to manual dissection.