ESCRS - FP07.02 - Ray-Tracing-Guided Versus Q-Value-Adjusted Lasik For Myopic Astigmatism ≥ 2.00 Diopters: 3-Month Clinical Outcomes

Ray-Tracing-Guided Versus Q-Value-Adjusted Lasik For Myopic Astigmatism ≥ 2.00 Diopters: 3-Month Clinical Outcomes

Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: FP07.02 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/6r4x-nw07

Authors: Dr Zhao Liu* 1

1Ophthalmology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi'an,China

Purpose

To compare the safety, efficacy and predictability of ray-tracing-guided with Q-value-adjusted laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopic astigmatism of 2.00 Diopters (D) or greater at 3 months postoperatively.

Setting

The InnovEyes Sightmap (Alcon Management S. A., Fort Worth, United States) and Topolyzer (Alcon Management S. A., Fort Worth, United States) was performed in InnovEyes group and Custom-Q group, respectively. All flaps were created using WaveLight® FS200 femtosecond laser (Alcon Management S. A., Fort Worth, United States). the stromal bed was ablated with the WaveLight® EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Management S. A., Fort Worth, United States).

Methods

This retrospective, comparative clinical study included 60 eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥ 2.00 D: 30 eyes in the ray-tracing-guided group (InnovEyes group) and 30 eyes in the Q-value-adjusted group (Custom-Q group). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), sphere and cylinder were evaluated preoperatively and 3-month postoperatively. General estimating equitation was used for inter-group comparison and correlation analyses to account for potential inter-eye correlation within subject.

Results

At 3-month postoperatively, CDVA was better in the InnovEyes group (P = 0.005), with 87% of eyes achieving cylinder within ± 0.25 D (vs. 63% in the Custom-Q group). Vector analysis revealed InnovEyes group induced a slight overcorrection (correction index: 1.04 ± 0.02) versus Custom-Q group’s undercorrection (correction index: 0.94 ± 0.02) (P = 0.007), with InnovEyes group exhibiting significantly smaller magnitude of error (0.08 ± 0.04  vs. -0.13 ± 0.05, P = 0.002).Correlation analyses revealed that both correction index and magnitude of error were non-significant correlated with TIA in either group (all P > 0.05). The group × TIA interaction was also non-significant (both P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Ray-tracing-guided LASIK is an effective, safe, and predictable surgical option for eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥ 2.00 D. Although a tendency toward mild astigmatism overcorrection was noted, it achieved statistically better postoperative CDVA and small astigmatic errors compared to the Q-value-adjusted group at 3 months postoperatively.