ESCRS - FP05.03 - Diagnostic Accuracy Of A Deep Learning Model For Automated Assessment Of Toric Intraocular Lens Rotation

Diagnostic Accuracy Of A Deep Learning Model For Automated Assessment Of Toric Intraocular Lens Rotation

Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: FP05.03 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/frgr-ng03

Authors: Dr Marcus Lisy* 1 , Christoph Baumann 2 , Zsolt Saffer 2 , Daniel Schartmüller 1 , Christina Leydolt 1

1Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry,Medical University of Vienna,Vienna,Austria, 2Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics,Vienna University of Technology,Vienna,Austria

Purpose

To develop a deep learning (DL) model for automated assessment of toric intraocular lens (IOL) rotation from retroillumination images using scleral landmarks as a reference, thereby minimizing the influence of cyclorotation.

Setting

This explorative study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry at the Medical University of Vienna in cooperation with the Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics at the Vienna University of Technology.

Methods

Two datasets of paired retroillumination images obtained 1 hour and 6 months after cataract surgery were manually graded for toric IOL rotation using scleral landmarks as reference. Dataset A included 125 eyes implanted with a Clareon toric IOL and dataset B included 120 eyes implanted with a Rayner EMV toric IOL. A deep learning framework combining a convolutional neural network (CNN) with additional visual computing algorithms was trained, validated, and tested. Model performance was evaluated in a binary classification task for detecting IOL rotation >2°, using decision thresholds of 2° and 5° for the predicted rotation. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results

For the Clareon toric IOL, at a 2° threshold, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.50, 0.56, and 0.56, respectively. At 5°, sensitivity remained 0.50, while specificity increased to 1.00, resulting in an accuracy of 0.94. For the Rayner EMV toric IOL, at 2°, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.82, 0.83, and 0.82, respectively. At 5°, sensitivity decreased to 0.73, specificity increased to 1.00, and overall accuracy was 0.91.

Conclusions

The developed DL model demonstrated promising performance in the assessment of toric IOL rotation. Increasing the threshold from 2° to 5° substantially improved specificity and overall accuracy for both IOL types, at the expense of sensitivity. Superior performance was observed for the Rayner EMV IOL, likely due to enhanced visibility of the toric IOL markings.