ESCRS - FP02.04 - Comparison Of Sequential Topography Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy And Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Cross Linking Versus Simultaneous Topography Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy And Corneal Collagen Crosslinking.

Comparison Of Sequential Topography Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy And Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Cross Linking Versus Simultaneous Topography Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy And Corneal Collagen Crosslinking.

Published 2026 - 44th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: FP02.04 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/xjx7-b003

Authors: Dr Deeksha Sharma* 1 , A/Prof. Chintan Malhotra 1 , A/Prof. Amit Gupta 1 , Dr Lekha Chandel 1 , Dr Vipasha Sharma 1

1Advanced Eye Centre Ophthalmology,Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh,Chandigarh,India

Purpose

To compare 6-month visual, tomographic, and safety outcomes of a sequential approach of

topography-guided PRK (TG-PRK) followed by accelerated transepithelial corneal crosslinking

(Acc-TECXL) versus simultaneous TG-PRK with accelerated epithelium-off CXL in progressive

keratoconus.

Setting

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh India 

Methods

This prospective randomized study included 30 eyes with progressive stage 1–2 keratoconus (age

>18 years; minimum corneal thickness >450 µm). All eyes underwent alcohol-assisted epithelial

removal followed by TG-PRK (maximum ablation depth 60 µm) using the Wavelight EX500 excimer

laser. Ten eyes underwent same-day accelerated epithelium-off CXL (simultaneous group), while

20 eyes underwent Acc-TECXL 4 weeks after TG-PRK (sequential group). Outcome measures at 6

months included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), corneal

topographic parameters, demarcation line depth, corneal haze (densitometry), endothelial cell

density, and epithelial healing.

Results

In the sequential group, significant improvement in mean decimal UDVA (0.49 ± 0.21) and CDVA

(0.90 ± 0.16) was observed as early as 1 month from baseline. In the simultaneous group,

comparable improvements in UDVA (0.49 ± 0.13) and CDVA (0.93 ± 0.15) occurred at 3 months.

Although the simultaneous group demonstrated a deeper central demarcation line, it was

associated with increased corneal haze, greater endothelial cell loss, and delayed epithelial healing

in 50% of eyes. No delayed epithelial healing was observed in the sequential group.

Conclusions

Both techniques effectively stabilise and regularise the cornea in early keratoconus. The sequential

approach offers advantages of faster epithelial healing, earlier visual recovery, and reduced

postoperative haze.