Retrospective Real-World Evidence Study: User Experience With A Toric And Non-Toric Full Range Of Vision Intraocular Lens
Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP19.10 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/q0g4-1d26
Authors: Raheleh Moravej 1 , Farhad Nejat* 2 , Alireza Sadeghi 1
1optometry,Iran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran, Islamic Republic Of, 2Vision health research clinic Tehran Iran,Tehran,Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Purpose
The present retrospective study aims to document ophthalmologists’ real-world experience with EN and ETN, focusing on healthcare provider (HCP) satisfaction and IOL utilization patterns.
Setting
This multicenter, cross-sectional, retrospective study includes user experience surveys from 11 HCPs from the USA (n=10) and Canada (n=1) with ≥3 years’ experience conducting cataract surgery, and who had completed cataract extraction and EN and/or ETN IOL implantation on ≥5 patients.
Methods
enVista Envy (EN) and enVista Envy toric (ETN) are full range of vision (FRoV) intraocular lenses (IOLs) that provide 4D of continuous visual range with dysphotopsia tolerance. In this multicenter, retrospective case review, and cross-sectional survey study, HCP participants provided ≥5 EN and/or ETN electronic medical record cases using a standardized case report form to document real-world clinical performance and visual outcomes. They also completed a retrospective user-experience survey about their experience with EN and/or ETN. Survey outcomes included practice characteristics, IOL utilization, and HCP satisfaction with EN and ETN.
Results
In the last year, participating HCPs performed an ~mean±SE of 1191±215 cataract surgeries (n=11); FRoV IOLs were used in ~mean±SE 21.7±6.0% of cases (n=11), including an ~mean±SE of 16±5 EN and 20±8 ETN IOLs, per HCP (n=9).
On a scale of 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied), 91% and 90% of HCPs rated their satisfaction with the overall performance of the EN (n=11) and ETN (n=10) IOLs, respectively, as ≥9. Similar ratings were obtained for most individual lens qualities and outcomes (e.g., rotational stability, centration, glistening-free, and visual outcomes [all distances]). All HCP respondents would recommend EN (n=11) and/or ETN (n=10) to friends and family.
Conclusions
This multicenter, retrospective case review and cross-sectional survey study provides important insights into real-world IOL utilization patterns, and HCP satisfaction and patient outcomes with the EN and ETN IOLs. HCPs reported high overall satisfaction and high satisfaction across key lens qualities and visual outcomes with EN and ETN IOLs.