Comparison Of Clinical Outcomes Partial Range Of Field Extended X-Edof And Pure Refractive Edof Lenses Versus Enhanced Lens

Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PO858 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/xkfz-0z87

Authors: Ertan Sunay* ¹ , Firat Helvacioglu ¹ , Sultan Kaya Unsal ¹

¹Ophthalmology,Veni Vidi Eye Hospital,Istanbul,Türkiye

Purpose

To compare three different types of intra ocular lenses (IOLs), categorized as Partial Range of Field extended X-EDOF, pure refractive EDOF and enhanced lens with respect to their clinical outcomes.

Setting

Veni Vidi Eye Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Methods

The retrospective comparative study consists of 120 eyes of 60 patients who underwent surgery with the implantation of one of the three types of IOLs. Postoperative evaluation was recorded at one month, postoperatively. The monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 6 m, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 60 cm and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm were assessed postoperatively on post-operative day 30, for all IOL groups. Defocus curves, and patient’s satisfactions and spectacle independence were also compared.

Results

With regards to UDVA, P value was not statistically significant. (P = 0.318 and 0.236, respectively). X EDOF and refractive EDOF group of IOLs had statistically significant better UIVA than mono-EDOF IOL group. (P1-2 < 0.001) and enhanced IOL group had statistically significant worse P value pertaining to UNVA (P1-2 < 0.001). Pertaining to spectacle independence, %60 of X-EDOf and refractive EDOF group did not need spectacles whereas all of the patients in enhanced IOL group required spectacles for reading distance.

Conclusions

All three IOLs compared in this study had good comparable distant visual acuity. Near and intermediate visual acuity was better with X- EDOF and refractive EDOF groups when compared to enhanced IOL group.