A Comparison Study Of Trifocal Intraocular Lenses For Correction Of Presbyopia During Cataract Surgery
Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO413 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/eyes-xw76
Authors: Nir Sorkin* 1 , Nir Gomel 1 , Robert Weinstock 2 , Eric Rosenberg 3
1Tel Aviv Medical Center,Tel Aviv,Israel, 2Eye Institute of West Florida,St. Petersburg,United States, 3New York Medical College,New York,United States
Purpose
To compare visual acuity and quality of life performances of a new hybrid refractive-diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and trifocal diffractive IOL.
Setting
Tertiary Care Eye Institute
Methods
A prospective, hospital-based study. Patients were randomized for bilateral implantation of Tecnic Synergy (ZFR00V ), and Trinova IOLs during cataract surgery. The main outcomes were defined as uncorrected distant, intermediate, and near visual acuities, and the VF-14 questionnaire aimed at visual performance. All data was statistically analysed. A p-value of <0.5 was significant.
Results
Among the 75 patients, 35 received bilateral ZFR00V implantation and 40 cases of acriva Trinova IOL during cataract surgery. Patients with ZFR00V had significantly better UIVA than patients with Acriva trinova (0.05 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.04 logMAR, P = 0.02). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in monocular distance-corrected (Synergy group 0.04 ± 0.11, and Trinova group 0.08 ± 0.10; P = .107) and near VA (0.01 ± 0.08, and 0.04 ± 0.10, respectively; P =0 .186). All patients had good visual performance with mean VF-14 scores above 3 points with no significant difference between the two IOL models. Spectacle independence was 98% for both distant and near vision in all groups.
Conclusions
Bilateral implantation of ZFR00V in cataract patients shows better intermediate visual acuity scores and similar daily visual performance compared to Trinova IOL.