ESCRS - FP31.01 - Descemet’S Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty And Phacoemulsification: Combined Versus Sequential Surgery

Descemet’S Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty And Phacoemulsification: Combined Versus Sequential Surgery

Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: FP31.01 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/9kds-c257

Authors: Claudette Abela-Formanek* 1 , Gerd Auffarth 2 , Allon Barsam 3 , Basak Bostanci 4 , Francesco Carones 5 , Dean Corbett 6 , Tiago Ferreira 7 , Fernando Llovet 8 , Sanjay Mantry 9 , Alain Saad 10

1Medical University of Vienna,Department of Ophthalmology,Vienna,Austria, 2University of Heidelberg,Department of Ophthalmology,Heidelberg,Germany, 3OCL Vision,London,United Kingdom, 4Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi,Suadiye Dünya Göz Hastanesi,Istanbul,Türkiye, 5ADVALIA Vision,Milan,Italy, 6Auckland Eye,Aukland,New Zealand, 7Clínica Privada de Oftalmologia,Lisbon ,Portugal, 8Clinica Baviera Aier Group,Valencia,Spain, 9Vision Scotland,Edinburgh,United Kingdom, 10Rothschild Foundation Hospital,Paris,France

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) combined with

phacoemulsification versus DMEK following phacoemulsification.

Setting

Institutional tertiary referral center university hospital

 

Methods

In this interventional retrospective comparative nonrandomized case series study, patients with Fuchs

endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) with either cataract or previous cataract surgery with intraocular

lens (IOL) implantation were assigned to one of the two groups according to lens status. Group 1

included patients who had cataract and FECD and would undergo triple procedure (phacoemulsification

with IOL implantation and DMEK), whereas Group 2 included patients who had FECD and had

phacoemulsification with IOL implantation earlier and would undergo DMEK only as a sequential

procedure.

 

Results

Postoperative BCVA in both groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months revealed a statistically

nonsignificant difference with mean logMAR BCVA at 6 months of 0.07 ± 0.18 and 0.07 ± 0.19 in Group 1

and Group 2, respectively (P > 0.05). The drop in endothelial cell density by the end of the 6th

postoperative month was by 39.44% ±7.92 and 38.73% ±8.10 in the triple‑procedure group and DMEK

only group, respectively (P = 0.005). The total postoperative complications rate and the rebubbling rate

were statistically similar between both groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Visual outcomes, endothelial cell loss, and rebubbling rate are comparable when DMEK is combined with

phacoemulsification or when it is performed as staged procedure, without statistically significant

difference in the outcomes.