Patient Reported Outcome Measures (Proms) Comparison Of State-Of-The-Art Monofocal And Enhanced Monofocal Iols With The Digital Tool Raypro
Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: FP01.15 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/gke1-2g12
Authors: Mariana Ferreira Francisco* 1 , Pedro Gil 2 , Ricardo Gertrudes 3 , Nuno Alves 3 , Vitor Maduro 3 , João Feijão 3 , João Gil 4 , Esmeralda Costa 4 , Andreia Rosa 4 , Cristina Tavares 5 , Maria João Quadrado 4 , Joaquim Murta 6
1Ophthalmology,Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal, 2Ophthalmology,Unidade Local de Saúde São José,Lisbon,Portugal;Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal, 3Ophthalmology,Unidade Local de Saúde São José,Lisbon,Portugal, 4Ophthalmology,Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal;Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal;Clinical Academic Centre of Coimbra, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal;Coimbra Ophthalmology Unit, Hospital da Luz de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal, 5Ophthalmology,Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal;Clinical Academic Centre of Coimbra, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal, 6Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal;Clinical Academic Centre of Coimbra, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal;Coimbra Ophthalmology Unit, Hospital da Luz de Coimbra,Coimbra,Portugal
Purpose
To compare the PROMs following implantation of monofocal RayOne Aspheric RAO600C and enhanced monofocal IOLs RayOne EMV RAO200E using the RayPRO database (Rayner, UK).
Setting
Eyecenter Hildesheim-Alfeld
Methods
Patients enrolled in RayPRO were independently surveyed by the RayPRO platform via anonymous email questionnaires. PROMs collected were satisfaction with cataract surgery outcome; spectacle independence for distance, intermediate, and near vision; and day and night dysphotopsia. The results for RayOne Aspheric (n = 122) and EMV (n = 77) were analysed and copared at 3 months after surgery.
Results
The scores for satisfaction with outcomes with RayOne Aspheric and RayOne EMV were 8.51 and 8.45, respectively (0=not satisfied at all; 10=extremely satisfied). The scores for overall visual disturbances at day and at night combined for RayOne Aspheric and RayOne EMV were 3.11 and 3.10, respectively. The spectacle independence score for far, intermediate and near combined with the question “How often do you wear glasses” (0=never; 10=always) was 6.92 RayOne Aspheric and 5.73 for RayOne EMV, respectively.
Conclusions
The PROMs of both the monofocal and enhanced monofocal IOLs were very similar regarding satisfaction with outcomes and overall visual disturbances at day and at night combined. The PROMs for spectacle independence revealed a higher patient reported level of spectacle independence for RayOne EMV. These PROMs suggest that RayOne EMV provides a higher level of spectacle independence whilst maintaining a dysphotopsia profile comparable to a state-of-the-art monofocal IOL.