Comparing Performance At Different Distances With Mini-Monovision (Offset -0.75) And Subjective Refraction Of 4 Increased Range Of Focus Non-Diffractive Iols Using Positive Or Negative Spherical Aberration Optics.

To compare binocular visual acuities and PROMs within toric and non-toric versions of TECNIS Eyhance (J&J Vision), RayOne EMV (Rayner), Impress (Hoya) and ZOE (Ophtalmopro).

Multicentric a) Clinique Juge Marseille, b) Clinique Jules Verne Nantes

A retrospective analysis of 120 eyes of patients with similar preoperative characteristics (mean age, sex, axial length), divided into four groups (30 eyes per group) and implanted binocularly with one of the four increased range of vision IOLs. The target refraction for the non-dominant eye was between -0.75 dioptres in mini-monovision. Binocular visual acuity was measured at distance, intermediate and near.

Patients' subjective impressions will be collected using the RayPRO digital application which includes the CAT-PROM5 questionnaire. 

The results are currently being analysed

Of the XXX patients selected, XXX were available for the evaluation.

Binocular corrected/uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDCA)

Binocular corrected/uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA)

Binocular corrected/uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)

PROMs analyses that the spectacle independence/ satisfaction with vision

A significant difference (or not) for each implant studied was found for UDCA,UIVA,UNVA and PROMs.

Increased range of vision IOLs with different optic technologies vary (or not) in the amount of intermediate,near vision and satisfaction they provide.