ESCRS - PP19.01 - Comparative Analysis Between A New Generation Refractive Edof Lens, A Diffractive Edof Lens And A Trifocal Diffractive Lens

Comparative Analysis Between A New Generation Refractive Edof Lens, A Diffractive Edof Lens And A Trifocal Diffractive Lens

Published 2024 - 42nd Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PP19.01 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/fm97-py82

Authors: Domenico Boccuzzi* 1 , FRANCESCO CARONES 1 , LUCA VIGO 1

1OPHTHALMOLOGY,ADVALIA VISION,MILAN,Italy

Purpose

COMPARISON OF THE BRAND NEW PURELY REFRACTIVE EDOF LENS PURESEE WITH A DIFFRACTIVE EDOF LENS (SYNFONY) AND A REFRACTIVE FROF LENS (SYNERGY)

Setting

ADVALIA VISION, MILAN ITALY

Methods

Visual acuity analysis, binocular depth of focus, spectacle independence, and dysphotopsia profile were analyzed among 65 patients implanted with three different advanced technology IOLs.

The three different IOLs are the PureSee (Johson & Johnson Vision) refractive EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) lens, the Simphony (Johson & Johnson Vision) diffractive EDOF lens, and the Synergy (Johson & Johnson Vision) diffractive FROF (Full Range of Focus) lens.

Results

Refractive results: 24/30 eyes (80%) are within ±0.25 D target  spheroequivalent; 3 eyes are -0.37 D and  -0.50 D SE (UCDVA 0.0-0.1 LogMAR); 1 eye is -0.62 D SE
(UCDVA 0.1 LogMAR); 2 eye is +0.37 D SE (UCDVA 0.0 LogMAR); 30/30 eyes (100%) have less than 0.50 D refractive cylinder

Binocular Visual Acuity 93% reched >/= -0.1 LogMAR, 7% =0.0 LogMAR for UCDVA (400cm); 100% >/= -0.1 LogMAR for UCIVA (60 cm); 80% >/= 0.0 LogMAR, 13% 0.1 LogMAR and 7% 0.2 LogMAR  for UCNVA.

 

Conclusions

30/30 eyes (100%) have BCDVA ≥ 0.1 LogMAR; 15/15 patients (100%) do not detect  any focus spikes or discontinuities; 15/15 patients (100%) refer excellent quality of vision in daylight and bright light conditions; 12/15 patients (80%) never need reading glasses.

The new purely refarctive PureSee EDOF IOL presents a 

•Broad range of vision with the appearance and quality of vision comparable to a monofocal
•Contrast sensitivity of a monofocal
•Dysphotopsia comparable to a monofocal
•Spectacle independence with limited/neglectable compromises
•Pupil independent
•Consistent & predictable outcomes
•Very high patient satisfaction