Utility Of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (Asoct) Biomarkers In Predicting Future Recurrences In Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome.
Published 2024 - 42nd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP18.03 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/1jws-v567
Authors: Sugaranjini Galiyugavaradhan* 1 , Vinay Pillai 1 , Raniya Kotteripallippurath 1
1cornea,Giridhar eye institute,Ernakulam,India
Purpose
To study anterior segment optical coherence tomography(ASOCT) findings and anterior segment optical coherence tomography based epithelial mapping(ASOCT- EPI) changes in patients with recurrent corneal erosion syndrome (RCES)and to determine the predictors of future recurrence amongst them.
Setting
Retrospective observational study (Jan 2022-23). All patients with symptoms suggestive of RCES were enrolled in the study . They were divided into 2 groups based on their reported history of recurrence. “GROUP F” : Frequent recurrence group i.e those patients who complained of at least 1 episode of recurrence in a month and “GROUP R”: Rare recurrence group (R): comprising of patients reporting limited recurrence since initial incident/symptoms once or less every 2-3 months.
Methods
RCES area charted on slit lamp evaluation was then scanned by ASOCT and ASOCT-epithelial (EPI) mapping.ASOCT changes are classified into Epithelial (E), Basement membrane-Bowmans(BM-BM)complex, and stromal(S).ASOCT-EPI mapping identified corneal epithelial thickening termed as hot spots and its correspondence to RCES area documented by slitlamp evaluation was assessed. Patients with corneal disease/surgery history were excluded
Results
Thirty-six patients were enrolled. Majority were females with left eye predilection. The most common cause of injury was fingernail (25 %).Among the ASOCT findings, E and BM-BM changes were noted in most patients,but a statistically significant difference between the two groups was noted for BM-BM changes only (more commonly seen in the F group with a p-value of 0.038).Stromal changes were rare.Our findings demonstrate that mere slit- lamp examination through which only epithelial changes can be recorded but not BM-BM changes, is incapable of deleniating patients at increased risk of frequent recurrent episodes.ASOCT-EPI hot spots matched clinically drawn RCES areas in majority of patients and demarcate the area of loose epithelium clearly.
Conclusions
Slit-lamp examination of epithelial erosion is inadequate for follow-up of RCES. AS-OCT biomarkers help identify patients needing early surgical intervention to reduce RCES morbidity.