ESCRS - PO752 - Descemets Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty V/S Descemets Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty In Fellow Eye Of Same Patient Of Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy With Cataract

Descemets Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty V/S Descemets Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty In Fellow Eye Of Same Patient Of Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy With Cataract

Published 2024 - 42nd Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PO752 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/5h03-kc95

Authors: Rohit Ramgopal Bang* 1 , manasi bang 2

1cornea cataract and refractive services ,shri krishna netralaya,aurangabad ,India, 2cataract and refractive services ,shri krishna netralaya,aurangabad ,India

Purpose

To compare objective and subjective outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the fellow eye of the same patients

Setting

The study was carried out in retrospective manner 

Methods

Seventeen patients with bilateral Fuchs endothelial dystrophy who underwent DSAEK earlier in 1 eye, and later underwent DMEK in the contralateral eye, Outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and endothelial cell density (ECD)

Results

Preoperative BSCVA (logMAR) was similar in both groups, 0.66 ± 0.4 in DMEK and 0.59 ± 0.4 in DSAEK (P [ .6).The DMEK group showed better BSCVA than the DSAEK group at the 6-month time point (0.25 ± 0.1 and 0.39 ± 0.1, for DMEK and DSAEK, respectively,P[ .02). Preoperative ECD (cells/mm2 ) was similar in both groups (2647 ± 249 and 2768 ± 404,          P [ .3) in DMEK and DSAEK, respectively. There was statistically significant difference found in ECD at 6 months (2227 ± 565 for DMEK and 1780 ± 433 for DSAEK, P [ .049). Subjective level of average satisfaction after DMEK was 6 and after DSAEK was 4.87 ± 1.19 (P[ .002)

Conclusions

DMEK provided better visual outcomes and lower endothelial cell loss than DSAEK and a higher level of patient satisfaction when assessed at 6 months after surgery. Our results comparing the 2 procedures in the same patients support the benefits of DMEK over DSAEK