Comparison Of Clinical Outcomes Of Extended Depth Intra Ocular Lenses Versus Mono-Edof Lens

Published 2024 - 42nd Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PO578 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/dgg8-2h86

Authors: Firat Helvacioglu* ¹ , Ertan Sunay ¹ , Sultan Kaya Unsal ¹

¹Ophthalmology,Veni Vidi Eye Hospital,Istanbul,Türkiye

Purpose

To compare three different types of intra ocular lenses (IOLs), categorized as X-EDOF, refractive EDOF and mono EDOF with respect to their clinical outcomes.

Setting

Veni Vidi Eye Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Methods

The retrospective comparative study consists 120 eyes of 60 patients who underwent surgery with the implantation of one of the three types of IOLs. Postoperative evaluation was recorded at one month, postoperatively. The monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 6 m, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 60 cm and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm were assessed postoperatively on post-operative day 30, for all IOL groups. Defocus curves, and patient’s satisfactions and spectacle independence were also compared.

Results

With regards to UDVA, P value was not statistically significant. (P = 0.198 and 0.148, respectively). X EDOF and EDOF group of IOLs had statistically significant better UIVA than mono-EDOF IOL group. (P1-2 < 0.001) and Mono-EDOF group had statistically significant worse P value pertaining to UNVA (P1-2 < 0.001). Pertaining to spectacle independence, %60 of X-EDOf and %50 of EDOF group did not need spectacles whereas all of the patients in mono-EDOF group required spectacles for reading distance.

Conclusions

All three IOLs compared in this study had good comparable distant visual acuity. Near and intermediate visual acuity was better with X- EDOF and refractive EDOF groups when compared to mono EDOF group.