Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation Of An Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens
Published 2024 - 42nd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO317 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/3n1y-tf54
Authors: Alex Lucia Vinciguerra* 1 , Marianna Presotto 1 , Kamil Jonak 2 , Mario Toro 3 , Rosa Giglio 1 , Daniele Tognetto 1
1Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences,University Eye Clinic of Trieste,Trieste,Italy, 2Department of Computer Science,University of Technology Lublin,Lublin,Poland, 33Department of Public Health, ,University of Naples,Naples,Italy
Purpose
To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of an enhanced monofocal IOL with two different monofocal IOLs.
Setting
University Eye Clinic of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Methods
Patients were consecutively randomized by block randomization and assigned in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to three study arms to bilaterally receive Tecnis® Eyhance (model ICB00) or Tecnis®1-piece (model ZCB00) or Alcon®1-piece (model Clareon, CNA0T0) respectively. Monocular and binocular (both corrected and uncorrected) visual acuities for far, intermediate and near were registered and compared among groups. Binocular corrected distance defocus curves were obtained. For each subject implanted with the ICB00 IOL, three binocular defocus curves were collected: with both eyes uncorrected, with the non- dominant eye corrected to yield −0.50 D myopia and with the non-dominant eye corrected to yield −1.00 D myopia.
Results
At 3 months follow-up, statistically significant differences for intermediate and near distance visual acuities were found between the three groups. Significant gains in binocular near vision can be achieved with the ICB00 IOL by leaving the non-dominant eye of patients with 0.50 D or 1.00 D of myopia.
Conclusions
The higher order monofocal provided better results in intermediate visual outcomes compared to standard monofocal IOLs analysed in the study.