Refractive Surgery For Aviation Professionals: Enhancing Vision Performance Without Compromising Flight Aptitude
Published 2024 - 42nd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO1138 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/2pdv-s820
Authors: Imane Jeddou* 1 , Aissam Fiqhi 1 , Adil ElKhoyaali 2 , Meriem Zerrik 2 , Mohamed Chemsi 2 , Yassine Mouzari 2 , Abdelbarre Oubaaz 2
1Ophthalmology,Military training hospital Mohammed V,Rabat,Morocco, 2Military training hospital Mohammed V,Rabat,Morocco
Purpose
In the dynamic realm of air transport, precision in vision is non-negotiable for aviation professionals. As refractive surgery techniques evolve, promising greater safety and efficacy, it is imperative to navigate cautiously, ensuring alignment with stringent ophthalmological standards governing flight aptitude. Delving into this intricate landscape, our study aims to dissect the refractive and functional outcomes of refractive surgeries among flight crew, shedding light on their transformative impact on aerospace expertise.
Setting
The Aircrew Medical Expertise Center in Rabat-Morocco
Methods
This 12-year retrospective study analyzed 112 eyes from 55 patients who underwent refractive surgery for myopia and/or myopic astigmatism. We included both military and civilian personnel within the Moroccan aerospace sector, subject to stringent medical evaluations adhering to standardized protocols. Preoperative assessments detailed refractive errors, and corneal astigmatism measured by Pentacam topography. Post-surgery, analysis focused on refractive and functional outcomes documenting potential adverse effects on flight safety. Additionally, the impact of surgery on aviation qualifications was assessed, elucidating the interplay between surgical intervention and aviation proficiency within this cohort.
Results
Among the array of procedures; LASIK emerged as the most prevalent choice (55%), followed by PRK (21%), and phakic implants (18%). Postoperative efficiency was appraised rigorously: civilian flight crew deemed successful outcomes when achieving visual acuity of at least 20/30 in each eye, aligning with the mandated standards of Moroccan civil aviation. Conversely, military pilots necessitated an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 in each eye for outcomes to be deemed satisfactory. Maintaining flight fitness entails undergoing a waiver procedure, contingent upon the preservation of contrast sensitivity and resilience to glare. Our findings showcased a noteworthy 84% success rate against a 16% incidence of suboptimal operative outcomes.
Conclusions
Our study underscores the dynamic interplay between the ophthalmologist's roles as both surgeon and aviation safety advocate in refractive surgery for flight crew members. The ophthalmologist assumes also the mantle of advisor, navigating the intricate realm of aviation safety to ensure optimal outcomes for this specialized cohort. Indeed, the visual function stands as a linchpin of safety in aviation, demanding meticulous ophthalmological assessments aligned with prevailing standards for any ocular intervention.