Comparison Of Outcomes Of A Continuous Range Of Vision Iol In A Mix And Match Versus Bilateral Strategy
Published 2023 - 41st Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP13.15 | DOI: 10.82333/grxs-sv35
Authors: Stephen Hannan 1 , David Teenan 1 , Jan Venter 1 , Sandro Di Simplicio 1 , Igor Occhipinti 1 , Steven Dell 2 , Eric Donnenfeld* 3
1Optical Express,Glasgow,United Kingdom, 2Ophthalmology, Cataract & Refractive Surgery,Dell Laser Consultants,Austin,United States, 3Ophthalmology,New York University Medical Centre,New York,United States
To report on the safety and efficacy outcomes of bilateral, as well as a mix and match strategy, for the TECNIS Synergy premium IOL indicated for patients looking for an improved continuous-range-of- vision.
Private Refractive Surgery (Optical Express)
Outcomes were examined on two cohorts of Synergy intraocular lens patients. The cohorts included: bilateral Synergy (ZFR00V) and the combination of Synergy (ZFR00V) and Tecnis 2.75 Add (ZKB00). There was data on 717 patients available for analysis in the bilateral Synergy cohort, and 287 patients in mixed lens cohort.
High quality performance across both lens combinations was observed. Slight differences between the two lens strategies existed with respect to uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, as well as quality of vision issues post implantation. However, both lens combinations provided superior uncorrected visual acuities and had excellent safety profiles. Quality of Vision difficulties were reported at comparable rates. Patients from both lens combination strategies reported high levels of satisfaction and recommendation.
Both lens combination strategies exhibit favorable performance. However, patient-specific motivations and objectives should be considered when making a final lens combination selection. Identifying performance differences in clinical, as well as patient-reported outcomes, for difference lens combination strategies is a critical component in development of a patient-personalised lens selection methodology.