Comparison Of Two Extended Depth Of Focus (Edof) Intraocular Lenses (Iols) After Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery.
Published 2023 - 41st Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO0510 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/dnv5-h269
Authors: Jean Michel Bosc 1 , Camille Bosc* 1 , Pierre Yves Santiago 1 , Romain Joubert 1
1Ophtalliance,Nantes,France
Purpose
To compare our clinical outcomes of two Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) after uncomplicated cataract surgery.
Setting
Retrospective single-center study
Methods
Retrospective study of patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of EDOF IOLs by the same surgeon.
Postoperative Uncorrected Distance and Near Visual Acuity, subjective refraction, binocular defocus curve and quality of vision and satisfaction questionnaires were measured. Age, gender, correction, optical biometry, keratometry, HOA, chord mu and refractive target were collected preoperatively.
Results
110 eyes of 55 patients (mean age: 72.7 years) were evaluated for IOL Zoe® and 106 eyes of 53 patients (mean age: 72.3 years) for IOL Isopure123®
30 days after surgery, the mean post operative uncorrected distance visual acuity monocular (UDVA) were significantly better for Zoe® IOL: 0.14 LogMar ± 0.11 for implantation with Zoe® IOL compared to 0.21 LogMar ± 0.11 for isopure123® (p-value = 0.003653) but not significantly for binocular distance visual acuity : 0.06 LogMar with Zoe® compared to 0.08LogMar with isopure123® ( p-value = 0.3011). No significant difference was observed for uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) monocular (p-value = 0.4147) and binocular (p-value = 0.9783) .
Conclusions
The present study suggests that the use of both Isopure123 and ZOE provides good visual acuity and tolerance.