ESCRS - PO0439 - Clinical Effects Of Acrysof Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation For Correcting Cataract Patients With Low Corneal Astigmatism

Clinical Effects Of Acrysof Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation For Correcting Cataract Patients With Low Corneal Astigmatism

Published 2023 - 41st Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PO0439 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/jb44-qd45

Authors: Yating Deng Yating Deng* 1 , Ping Zhao Ping Zhao 2

1Ophthalmology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University,Guangzhou,China, 2Ophthalmology,Liaoning Aier Eye Hospital,Shenyang,China

Purpose

To compare the clinical effects of AcrySof toric intraocular lens (IOL) and the non-toric IOLs in cataract patients with low corneal astigmatism. 

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology, Liaoning Aier Eye Hospital, China. 

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 82 eyes of 81 patients with age related cataract who were diagnosed as low regular corneal astigmatism(0.75D~1.5D) were enrolled. The patients were implanted with either the AcrySof IQ T2/T3 Toric IOLs (Toric group, n=48) or the AcrySof IQ IOLs (Non-toric group, n=34) after cataract phacoemulsification. Postoperative residual astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were evaluated in both groups. Data were statistically analyzed using the independent samples T-test, the Chi-squared test and the non-parametric rank sum test. 

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the age, sex, preoperative UDVA, BCDVA, corneal astigmatism, spherical equivalent and axial length (P>0.05). The median absolute value of residual astigmatism was significantly lower in the Toric group (0.50D) than the non-Toric group (1.00D) (P=0.000). The proportion of eyes with residual astigmatism less than 0.25D was significantly higher in the Toric group (37.50%) than the non-Toric group (11.76%) (P=0.010). The proportion of eyes with residual astigmatism less than 0.5D was also significantly higher in the Toric group (70.83%) than the non-Toric group (14.71%) (P=0.000). The median rotation of Toric IOL at 3 months after operation was 2 degrees.

Conclusions

Compared with non-Toric IOLs, the use of Toric IOLs effectively reduced postoperative residual astigmatism and improved patients’ visual quality.