Comparison Of Clinical Outcomes Between 3 Types Of Toric Iols – Enhanced Intermediate Function Monofocal, Low-Added Segmental, And Conventional Monofocal Lens
Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP19.13 | Type: ESCRS 2022 - Posters | DOI: 10.82333/6g51-sc40
Authors: Shinichiro Nakano* 1 , Ruriko Mori 2 , Masaharu Iida 2 , Tetsuro Oshika 3
1Ophthalmology,Ryugasaki Saiseikai Hospital,Ryugasaki,Japan, 2Ophthalmology,RYUGASAKI SAISEIKAI HOSPITAL,Ryugasaki,Japan, 3Ophthalmology,University of Tsukuba,Tsukuba,Japan
Purpose
Setting
Ryugasaki Saiseikai hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
Methods
Eyes with corneal astigmatism over 0.75 diopters (D) meeting all inclusion criteria were implanted with a new enhanced intermediate function monofocal T-IOL (Tecnis Eyhance toric, DIW) or low-added segmental T-IOL (Lentis Comfort toric, LS313 MF15T) or conventional monofocal T-IOL (TECNIS Toric II OptiBlue, ZCW). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity, T-IOL alignment, and residual astigmatism were examined at 3-month postoperatively.
Results
22 eyes of 21 cases with Eyhance, 39 eyes of 24 cases with Lentis, and15 cases of 14 eyes with OptiBlue T-IOL were enrolled. UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA logMAR of Eyhance were -0.008, 0.12, and 0.49, respectively. UDVA was comparable to Lentis and OptiBlue (P=0.87, 0.53 respectively). UIVA was comparable to Lentis (P=0.54) and tended to be better than OptiBlue although statistically not significant (P=0.075). UNVA was lower than Lentis (P=0.04) and equivalent to OptiBlue (P=0.07). T-IOL misalignment was 1.73 degrees, which tended to be better than Lentis (P=0.058) and equivalent to OptiBlue (P=0.48). Residual astigmatism was 0.14 D, comparable to Lentis and OptiBlue (P=0.90,0.98).
Conclusions
Eyhance toric T-IOL (DIW) provided intermediate vision comparable to Lentis T-IOL, and rotational stability comparable to OptiBlue T-IOL, and astigmatic correction equivalent to both Lentis and OptiBlue T-IOLs.