Sterile Inflammatory Reaction Mimicking Endophthalmitis After Prk - Case Presentation
Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO1070 | Type: Poster | DOI: 10.82333/rkb7-jt76
Authors: Uriel Israeli* 1 , Adi Segal 2 , Or Ben-Shaul 3
1Ophthalmology,Carmel Medical Center,Haifa,Israel, 2Ophthalmology,Carmel Medical Center,Haifa,Israel;Faculty of Medicine,Technion,Haifa,Israel, 3Faculty of Medicine,Technion,Haifa,Israel;Ophthalmology,Carmel Medical Center,Haifa,Israel
Purpose
To report a rare case of severe sterile inflammatory response following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) that mimicked infectious endophthalmitis.
Setting
The patient was initially treated at a private refractive surgery clinic and subsequently referred to the Department of Ophthalmology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Methods
Case report of a 19-year-old immunocompetent female who developed acute-onset ocular pain and decreased vision 72 hours after undergoing uncomplicated PRK for low myopia (-2.00D with minimal astigmatism) in the left eye. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation was performed, including anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and ocular ultrasonography. Extensive microbiological workup comprised corneal scrapings for Gram stain, bacterial/fungal cultures, and multiplex PCR for detection of bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens.
Results
Upon presentation, visual acuity of hand motion. Slit-lamp examination showed diffuse central corneal infiltrate with indistinct margins, pigmentary keratic precipitates, and 0.5mm hypopyon, normal intraocular pressure. AS-OCT showed stromal thickening and endothelial irregularities. All microbiological tests were negative, suggesting sterile marginal hypersensitivity (SMH) as a possible cause. Treatment included intensive topical steroids, fortified antibiotics, antibiotic ointment, and systemic therapy (prednisone, doxycycline, ascorbate). Marked improvement noted with complete hypopyon resolution within 72 hours. By day 5, best-corrected visual acuity improved to 6/12, with mild corneal haze, minimal edema, and reduced Descemet's folds.
Conclusions
This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in distinguishing sterile inflammation, likely caused by sterile marginal hypersensitivity (SMH), from infectious keratitis or endophthalmitis after PRK. Effective management involves prompt anti-inflammatory therapy with prophylactic antimicrobials, preserving visual outcomes despite the alarming presentation.