ESCRS - PO066 - White Cataract That Could Surprise Experienced Surgeon – Case Presentation

White Cataract That Could Surprise Experienced Surgeon – Case Presentation

Published 2025 - 43rd Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PO066 | Type: Case Report | DOI: 10.82333/kkha-1333

Authors: Ewa Mrukwa-Kominek* 1 , Monika Sarnat-Kucharczyk 2 , Rafal Leszczynski 3

1DepT of Ophthalmology,Mediacl University of Silesia,Katowice,Poland, 2Dept of Ophthalmology,Mediacl University of Silesia,Katowice,Poland;Dept of Ophthalmology,University Clinical Center of the Medical University of Silesia,Katowice,Poland, 3Dept of Ophthalmology,University Clinical Center of the Medical University of Silesia,Katowice,Poland

Purpose

The aim of the study is to present a patient's case with cataract that surprised an experienced surgeon;

The surgical method of the nucleus removal, the possibility of visual acuity improvement, and postoperative healing process were presented,

 

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology, University Clinical Center of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice

Report of case

A 70-year old man, hospitalized because of high IOP in the right eye (RE) with advanced white cataract. RE distance BCVA was light perception. RE IOP was 29 mm Hg on maximal topical therapy

RE medical history: Uveitis in the course of toxoplasmosis more than 20 years ago, recurring every few years, Cataract progressing during observation, Not referred earlier for surgery due to retinal changes in the macular area caused by toxoplasmosis

Referred by the general ophthalmologist concerned about the "white pupil", looks like a white intumescent cataract. Pupil in almost circular synechiae, not responding to mydriatics

Surgery: after pupil dilation using iris hooks the situation change because of white pupillary membrane and dense subluxated cataract were presented.

Authors presented possibility and the course of surgery phacoemulsification, manual nucleus removal and  finalize with PPV.

Corneal edema occurred after the procedure,

In addition to standard postoperative treatment, endophthalmitis prophylaxis, intensive anti-edema and intensive corneal regeneration treatment were used.

Slow VA improvement was noticed, IOP stabilized 12-14 mmHg

Conclusion/Take home message

Never give up on helping a patient, but assess your capabilities and take appropriate surgical decision.

It is important to know when to withdraw from the procedure if it is more beneficial for the patient.