Ocular Rosacea In Children, A Diagnosis Not To Be Missed!
Published 2023 - 41st Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO0798 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/czbj-tn66
Authors: Safaa Jihad* 1 , hasnaa lamari 2
1casablanca,cabinet Dr Jihad,casablanca,Morocco, 2mohamadia,clinique al bassar,mohamadia,Morocco
Purpose
In children, the ocular signs of rosacea are often misleading, atypical and can mislead the diagnosis and be mistaken for another etiology such as herpes or allergic keratoconjunctivitis.
Setting
Clinical case: We report the cases of 4 children aged 3 years, 7 years and 8 years and 12 years, addressed for respectively for
cases 1 and 2: dragging corneal ulcer.
cases 3 and 4: tearing, red eye, repeated chalazion, skin rash.
The ophthalmological examination made the diagnosis of ocular and cutaneous rosacea. eyelid care Topical and oral antibiotics have shown favorable results for skin and eye lesions.
Methods
Discussion: being a rare skin condition in children, the ocular revelation of Rosacea remains exceptional, and insufficiently mentioned. The existence of blepharitis, keratoconjunctivitis or episcleritis should suggest the diagnosis in a child with or without facial skin signs. the treatment based on rigorous palpebral care, topical and general antibiotics if the age allows it remains very effective. but do not spare possible recurrences.
Results
Discussion: being a rare skin condition in children, the ocular revelation of Rosacea remains exceptional, and insufficiently mentioned. The existence of blepharitis, keratoconjunctivitis or episcleritis should suggest the diagnosis in a child with or without facial skin signs. the treatment based on rigorous palpebral care, topical and general antibiotics if the age allows it remains very effective. but do not spare possible recurrences.
Conclusions
the diagnosis of ocular rosacea in even very young children must be evoked before a bundle of blepharo-kerato-conjunctival signs whether or not associated with cutaneous signs. moreover, the unusual, recurrent and atypical course of pathology of the child's ocular surface should suggest this diagnosis.