Clinical Evaluation And Comparision Of Toric Iol Rotational Stablilty When Implanted Under Balanced Salt Solution (Bss) Vs Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices (Ovd)
Published 2023 - 41st Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: FP20.05 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/3dpz-0x35
Authors: ROHAN Male BOWRY* 1 , SHEETAL BRAR 2 , SRI GANESH 2
1CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE,INNOCENT HEARTS EYE CENTRE,JALANDHAR,India, 2CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE,NETHRADHAMA SUPER SPECIALITY EYE HOSPITAL,BENGALURU,India
Purpose
To Evaluate and compare Toric IOL Rotational Stablilty when implanted under Balanced salt solution (BSS- Group A) vs Ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVD- Group B)
Setting
- OVERALL STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, interventional clinical trial
- NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: 100 eyes of 100 patients(50 in each group)
- NUMBER OF GROUPS: 2(50 in each group)
- STUDY DURATION: 12 months
- SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Standard Phacoemulsification cataract surgery with in the bag implantation of Toric IOL under BSS( GROUP A)/OVD( GROUP B ) aiming at emmetropia in both eyes.
Methods
- Total of 100 eyes of 100 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Standard Phacoemulsification was performed with in the bag implantation of the Toric IOL.
- Pre-op Characteristics such as UDVA, CDVA, keratometry readings (K1 &K2), axial length, corneal astigmatism, IOL power and IOL axis were noted. Biometery was performed using the Barrett’s TK toric formula implemented in the IOL Master 700.
- A foldable acrylic IOL with acrylic modified C- haptics was used.
- The recommended A-constant was used.
- All eyes were targeted at emmetropia.
- Surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperatively, surgeon used a markerless system (Callisto eye -Carl Zeiss Meditech) for toric IOL placement along the intended axis.
Results
- The pre- op characteristics in both the groups were matched .
- The IOL rotation post opeartively checked with dilated examination and by iTrace( from tracey technologies).
- In group A (BSS) 80% had rotation within 0-5 degrees, Group B had a rotaion of 5-10 degrees in 30 % patients and > 10 degrees in 8% patients.
- Group A ( BSS) showed IOL Rotation of
3.58 ± 2.56 and Group B (OVD) showed
5.02±3.31rotation, which was significant ( p value < 0.01)
Conclusions
- A significant increase in Toric Iol rotation in OVD group does makes implantation under BSS safer and more stable.
- Incomplete removal of OVD in group B can be a factor for Toric IOL rotation.
- Incomplete OVD clearance, which causes reduced friction between the haptics and the capsular bag.
- Longer follow up is required, which will look up into the late capsular shrinkage, which might lead to IOL rotation.
- And also comparison between different brands of toric IOL has to be done in respective BSS and OVD , to check upon the material and design factor , which also might be a factor for topic IOL rotation.