ESCRS - FP09.08 - Isopure® Versus Vivity®: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomised Comparison Of Visual Acuity Between Two New Extended Depth-Of-Focus Intraocular Lenses

Isopure® Versus Vivity®: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomised Comparison Of Visual Acuity Between Two New Extended Depth-Of-Focus Intraocular Lenses

Published 2023 - 41st Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: FP09.08 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/ytfb-aj55

Authors: Kristof Vandekerckhove* 1 , Nikola Tomagova 1

1Clinical Study Department,Vista Alpina eye clinic,Visp,Switzerland

Purpose

To assess differences in photopic visual acuity, binocular defocus curves and spectacle independence after bilateral same-day cataract surgery with implantation of Isopure® or Vivity®, with mini-monovision.

Setting

Vista Alpina Eye Clinic, Visp, Switzerland

Methods

This is a double-blind, randomised, prospective study including 136 eyes of 68 patients implanted bilaterally with Isopure® or Vivity®, with mini-monovision (-0.5D). The primary endpoint is monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), measured throughout the entire study (4 to 6 months), along with a full set of far, intermediate (66 cm) and near (40 cm) visual acuity. Binocular distance-corrected defocus curves are obtained after 1 to 2 months. Spectacle independence (PRSIQ) and quality of vision are assessed after 4 to 6 months.

Patient enrolment is complete. The current interim analysis is based on 1-to-2-month data from 98 eyes (visual acuity and defocus curves) and 4-to-6-month data from 31 patients (spectacle independence).

Results

Overall, 99% and 91% of eyes were within ±1.0D and ±0.50D of target refraction. Photopic monocular CDVA was -0.06±0.06 logMAR and +0.01±0.14 logMAR for I® and V®, respectively (p = 0.0001).
The uncorrected photopic binocular visual acuity for I® and V® was -0.05±0.10 versus +0.04±0.07 logMAR (p = 0.002) at distance, +0.10±0.12 versus +0.10±0.09 logMAR (ns) at intermediate distance and +0.31±0.15 versus +0.28±0.09 logMAR (ns) at near.
The defocus curve was wider for V® (up to -1.9D) than for I® (-1.5D), but visual acuity at 0 and -0.5D defocus was significantly better for I®.
Respectively 88% vs. 85 % of I® and V® patients felt comfortable seeing far without glasses, 88% vs. 93% at intermediate distance, and 38% vs. 42 % at near.

Conclusions

According to this interim analysis, all uncorrected and corrected monocular and binocular distance visual acuity values were significantly better for the Isopure® eyes. Intermediate and near visual acuity was comparable. The defocus curve for Vivity® was wider, theoretically leading to functional vision up to 53 cm, compared to 67 cm for Isopure®. This was reflected in slightly higher spectacle independence in the Vivity® group at intermediate and near distances. The study is nearing completion and the final analysis will be presented at the ESCRS Congress in Amsterdam.