Not Everything Is Spherical Aberration
Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO006 | Type: Case report | DOI: 10.82333/zzaz-1m35
Authors: Dante Buonsanti* 1
1Centro buonsanti,buenos aires,Argentina
Four months after initial surgery, he had an IOL exchange in his right eye. The IOL selected was tecnis za9003, with an asphericity of -0.27, in order to reduce spherical aberration from his cornea as much as it can. The surgery went well, but the patient was now complaining about positive dysphotopsia. I decided to exchange the IOL in his left eye for a Bausch & Lomb LI61AO, a silicone IOL with zero spherical aberration. Due to the silicone having a lower refractive index than acrylic, the problem was solved.
He still stays with the positive dysphotopsia because he is happy with his small myopic result as he can see the computer without glasses.
Nowadays he uses brimonidine drops whenever dysphotopsia bothers but he is happy with the result.
Despite having a higher spherical aberration in the eye with a zero asphericity IOL, the night vision symptoms are not bothering him after trying three different types of IOLs.
If a patient have type A personality as this one had, a big pupil size, and also a considerably high amount of spherical aberration in his cornea, could possibly be a candidate for any type of night vision symptom, regardless the IOL.
Silicone IOL like LI61AO from Bausch and Lomb, specially doing reverse optic capture, should be the IOL of choice when we encounter with some of this problems. Due to its material, the incidence of dysphotopsia is as low as possible even in patients like this one.