Agreement And Repeatability Of Axial Length And Main Ocular Biometric Endpoints Between Vemos-Axl And Iolmaster 700 For The Vemos Project Software Validation.
Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: FPM11.06 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/2eca-wj24
Authors: Marina José-Martínez* 1 , Antonio Martínez-Abad 1 , Ana B. Plaza-Puche 1 , Francesco Versaci 2 , Gabriele Vestri 2 , Alejandra E. Rodriguez 1 , Jorge L. Alió 3
1Research and Development Department,VISSUM Grupo Miranza,Alicante,Spain, 2CSO (Construzioni Strumenti Oftalmici),Firenze,Italy, 3Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery,VISSUM Grupo Miranza,Alicante,Spain;School of Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University,Alicante,Spain
Purpose
Setting
Methods
The study included 30 eyes of 30 patients (mean age of 37.9 ± 9.7 years) where healthy eye examinations were performed with VEMoS-AXL (CSO) and IOLMaster 700 (Zeiss). Ocular biometric endpoints were collected and compared.
The normality of the sample was confirmed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p>0.05). The repeatability of 6 consecutive measurements of axial length provided by VEMoS-AXL was evaluated using the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Oneway ANOVA analysis. The comparison of ocular biometric parameters between devices was performed using the Paired T-test considering a significance level of 0.05. The agreement between the two devices was carried out using Bland-Altman method.
Results
The repeatability analysis of AXL revealed a Sw of 0.8 micron and an ICC of 1.00. Mean AL was 23.72±1.31 mm with VEMoS-AXL and 23.69±1.28 with IOLMaster, not appreciating statistical difference between both devices (p 0.355). ANOVA analysis showed absence of differences in the three parameters for consecutive measurements. However, the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and corneal central thickness (CCT) showed minimal statistical differences between devices (mean difference of CCT 3.1±6.7 mm, mean difference of ACD 0.13±0.04 mm, p<0.05) but presenting strong correlations between measurements (rho>0.90, p <0.001).
Conclusions