ESCRS - FPM04.05 - Visual Field Outcomes From The Randomized, Multicenter, Horizon Trial

Visual Field Outcomes From The Randomized, Multicenter, Horizon Trial

Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: FPM04.05 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/4gq8-1z76

Authors: Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed* 1

1Ophthalmology,University of Toronto,Toronto,Canada

Purpose

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) with a Schlemm’s canal microstent (SCM) in combination with cataract surgery has been shown to reduce IOP, medication use, and risk of repeat glaucoma surgery. This study compares visual field outcomes after cataract surgery plus SCM with cataract surgery alone.

Setting

Prospective, multicenter, single-masked randomized controlled trial conducted at 26 sites in the US and 12 international sites. Subjects with mild to moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and visually significant cataract with washed-out diurnal IOP 22 - 34 mmHg were randomized 2:1 to cataract surgery with or without a SCM (Hydrus Micorstent, Ivantis, Irvine CA).

Methods

Medications for IOP control were reintroduced as required.  Scheduled visits including standard automated perimetry (24-2 SITA Standard) were conducted over five years follow-up. The response variable was point-wise sensitivity over time (i.e., at each tested VF location for each subject). Observations were grouped by location, VF cluster (based on the trajectory of nerve fiber bundles) and eye in a hierarchical nested fashion. Time from surgery and the allocation arm were used as fixed effects. The interaction between these fixed effects modelled the difference in rate of progression (RoP) between the two arms. 

Results

556 eyes were randomized, after cataract surgery, to SCM (n = 369) or no further treatement (CS, n = 187). The SCM and CS groups did not differ with respect to baseline characteristics. Continuous 5-year follow up was completed in 444/556 eyes (80%). There were no significant differences in baseline sensitivity. Over 5 years of follow up, the mean RoP of VF damage was significantly slower in the SCM group compared to CS group (-0.26 dB/year vs. -0.49 dB/year, difference = 0.23 dB, 95% CI 0.5 – 0.4, p=0.0138).

Conclusions

SCM combined with phacoemulsification results in reduced IOP and sustained medication reduction for up to 5 years. The treatment arm was associated with a significant reduction in RoP. The limitations of medical therapy (non-compliance, circadian IOP fluctuation) are well documented and may be a contributing factor to the difference in RoP.
Combined phacoemulsification with Schlemm’s canal microstent significantly reduced visual field loss over 5 years compared to cataract surgery alone.