OPHTHALMOLOGICA Vol 235 Issue 2 featuring multiple sclerosis and choroidal thickness

OPHTHALMOLOGICA Vol 235 Issue 2 featuring multiple sclerosis and choroidal thickness
Sebastian Wolf
Published: Wednesday, March 2, 2016
MS INCREASES CHOROIDAL THICKNESS The findings of a new study indicate that decreased choroidal thickness occurs in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients whether or not they have a history of optic neuritis (ON). The observational comparative study involved 68 eyes of 34 MS patients and 60 eyes of 30 healthy subjects who underwent enhanced depth imaging-optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). They found that mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was reduced significantly in MS patients (310.71μm) versus healthy controls (364.85μm) (p < 0.001), as was the choroidal thickness at six other measurement points. The study’s authors suggest that their findings provide evidence that vascular dysregulation may play a role in the pathophysiology of the disease. E Esen et al, “Evaluation of Choroidal Vascular Changes in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography”, Ophthalmologica 2016; Volume 235, Issue 2. REDUCING RISK OF HIGH MYOPIA IN CHILDREN Spending more time outdoors may reduce a child’s risk of high axial myopia, according to findings from the Shandong Children Eye Study. The population study involves 6,364 children aged 4-18 years, from an eastern Chinese province where the prevalence of high axial myopia is over 10 per cent. A multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for high axial myopia included more time spent indoors reading/writing (p < 0.001) and less time spent outdoors (p = 0.005). Other risk factors included having a parent with high myopia, (p < 0.001), residing in an urban area (p < 0.001), longer corneal curvature radius (p < 0.001) and higher intraocular pressure (p = 0.008). TL Lu et al, “Associated Factors in Children: The Shandong Children Eye Study”, Ophthalmologica 2016; Volume 235, Issue 2. SEVERE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY Diabetic users of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), may be at a significantly higher risk for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) than are users of β-blockers, a new study suggests. The study involved hypertensive Type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-100 identified from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) 2005. Using Cox proportional hazard models, their analysis indicated that the use beta-blockers posed the lowest risk of STDR, followed by CCBs, followed by ACEIs and ARBs. Lin J et al, “Antihypertensive Drugs and Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes”, Ophthalmologica 2016; Volume 235, Issue 2.
Latest Articles
Towards a Unified IOL Classification

The new IOL functional classification needs a strong and unified effort from surgeons, societies, and industry.

Read more...

The 5 Ws of Post-Presbyopic IOL Enhancement

Fine-tuning refractive outcomes to meet patient expectations.

Read more...

AI Shows Promise for Meibography Grading

Study demonstrates accuracy in detecting abnormalities and subtle changes in meibomian glands.

Read more...

Are There Differences Between Male and Female Eyes?

TOGA Session panel underlined the need for more studies on gender differences.

Read more...

Simulating Laser Vision Correction Outcomes

Individualised planning models could reduce ectasia risk and improve outcomes.

Read more...

Mastering IOL Exchange

Tips and tricks for an uncomplicated replacement procedure.

Read more...

Need to Know: Aberrations, Aberrometry, and Aberropia

Understanding the nomenclature and techniques.

Read more...

When Is It Time to Remove a Phakic IOL?

Close monitoring of endothelial cell loss in phakic IOL patients and timely explantation may avoid surgical complications.

Read more...

Delivering Uncompromising Cataract Care

Expert panel considers tips and tricks for cataracts and compromised corneas.

Read more...

Organising for Success

Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.

Read more...