Long-term outcomes of refractive surgery

Long-term outcomes of refractive surgery
Howard Larkin
Howard Larkin
Published: Saturday, October 12, 2019
Pictured at the ESCRS symposium at AAO 2019: (left to right) Oliver Findl, Rudy Nuijts, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard,Thomas Kohnen, Marcony R Santhiago, John Chang, George O Waring IV and Paolo Vinciguerra At the AAO 2019 Refractive Surgery Subspecialty Day in San Francisco, USA, ESCRS presenters drew on primary research and extensive literature searches to a central question: What Happened To Our Refractive Surgery Patients In The Long Term? Surface ablation, including PRK and transPRK, lamellar procedures, including LASIK and femtoLASIK, and lenticule extraction procedures, including SMILE, produce comparable visual outcomes with good predictability for periods up to 18 years, said Thomas Kohnen MD, PhD, FEBO, of Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Long-term issues with PRK and LASIK include myopic regression, with LASIK more stable after six years. Challenges include predicting and preventing ectasia and other complications, and accurately calculating IOL power for subsequent cataract surgery. Rudy MMA Nuijts MD, PhD, of Maastricht University, The Netherlands, focused on angle-supported and implantable collamer lenses. At 10 years, UCDA declined 1.5 Snellen lines due to cataract formation and myopization from increased axial length. Endothelial cell loss varies, with rates two to three times physiological rates. 10-year explant rates may vary up to 12 per cent for iris and 18 per cent for ICLs. Patients should be counselled that pIOLs are a temporary solution. Long-term toric IOL success depends on rotational stability, said Oliver Findl MD, of Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Rotation mostly occurs in the first hours after surgery and is less likely once the capsule fuses, though fibrosis may result in late rotation. When implanting toric IOLs in younger patients, axis shift should be considered, under-correcting patients displaying with-the-rule astigmatism, and fully correcting those with against-the-rule. Multifocal IOLs are not advisable for patients at risk of central visual field reduction due to macular degeneration, retinal disease or glaucoma, said Beatrice Cochener-Lamard MD, PhD, of the University of Brest, France. Most complications occur in the short term, and at more than 10 years there are no reports of explanation for late complications, including retinal detachment, AMD and PCO. What happens to mIOLs after 20 years is unknown, so care should be taken in implanting them in young patients, said Professor Cochener-Lamard.
Tags: cataract and refractive, refractive, AAO 2019
Latest Articles
Towards a Unified IOL Classification

The new IOL functional classification needs a strong and unified effort from surgeons, societies, and industry.

Read more...

The 5 Ws of Post-Presbyopic IOL Enhancement

Fine-tuning refractive outcomes to meet patient expectations.

Read more...

AI Shows Promise for Meibography Grading

Study demonstrates accuracy in detecting abnormalities and subtle changes in meibomian glands.

Read more...

Are There Differences Between Male and Female Eyes?

TOGA Session panel underlined the need for more studies on gender differences.

Read more...

Simulating Laser Vision Correction Outcomes

Individualised planning models could reduce ectasia risk and improve outcomes.

Read more...

Mastering IOL Exchange

Tips and tricks for an uncomplicated replacement procedure.

Read more...

Need to Know: Aberrations, Aberrometry, and Aberropia

Understanding the nomenclature and techniques.

Read more...

When Is It Time to Remove a Phakic IOL?

Close monitoring of endothelial cell loss in phakic IOL patients and timely explantation may avoid surgical complications.

Read more...

Delivering Uncompromising Cataract Care

Expert panel considers tips and tricks for cataracts and compromised corneas.

Read more...

Organising for Success

Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.

Read more...