Cheryl Guttman Krader
Published: Saturday, July 29, 2017
Despite having potential benefits for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, ray tracing methods still have limited accuracy, according to research.
“Ray tracing has the benefit of eliminating approximation errors and gives the opportunity for more elaborate calculations, such as to optimise refraction while considering corneal aberrations, if they are known from preoperative measurements. However, as in every other method of IOL power calculation, the accuracy of ray tracing is limited by the inaccuracy of the measurements that are used in the calculation and by the unpredictability of IOL position,” said Dr Rallatos, Athens Eye Hospital, Athens, Greece.
He presented findings from analyses conducted using data from 53 eyes implanted with an acrylic aspheric IOL. Anatomical measurements were obtained with an optical biometer, refractions were measured with an autorefractor, and IOL power calculations were done with ray tracing software (OpticStudio 15.5).
Dr Rallatos reported that the difference between the achieved and attempted correction averaged 0.25D, but it was equal or greater than 1D in about 10% of the eyes.
The postoperative IOL position represents the greatest source of unpredictability. However even in the hypothetical case of perfect IOL position prediction there will be a residual refractive error. Analyses undertaken to estimate how the parameters involved in the power calculation contributed to this residual error showed that error in anterior cornea power had the greatest influence, accounting for 22.8% of the total error. It was followed by errors attributable to posterior cornea curvature (14.4%) and axial length measurement (13.6%).
“Posterior corneal power is known to be a source of IOL power calculation error in eyes with previous refractive surgery, but it also seems to be an important source of error in intact eyes,” Dr Rallatos told EuroTimes.
IOL POSITION
Investigating correlations between several anterior chamber anatomic parameters (anterior chamber depth, white-to-white, and C-constant) and known IOL position, indicated that the C-constant, a concept introduced by Thomas Olsen MD, would likely be most useful for improving IOL position prediction.
However, even when IOL position was known through postoperative measurement and after taking into account posterior cornea power and inaccuracies in other biometric measurements, there was still residual error.
“We call this the lost refraction,” said Dr Rallatos, and he proposed that it can be accounted for in enhancement procedures by using normalised weighting coefficients to distribute it across all of the model parameters.
Gerasimos Rallatos: g.rallatos@athenseyehospital.gr
Tags: IOL, ray tracing
Latest Articles
ESCRS Today 2025: Happy Anniversaries!
ESCRS celebrates milestones with pioneers in IOLs, LASIK, femtosecond lasers, and corneal transplantation.
Read more...
ESCRS Today 2025: A Congress for Everyone
From YOs to families, the ESCRS Annual Meeting embraces full participation through inclusivity.
Read more...
ESCRS Today 2025: All Eyes on Innovation
Watching out for obstacles and opportunities
Read more...
Beyond the Numbers
Empowering patient participation fosters continuous innovation in cataract surgery.
Read more...
Thinking Beyond the Surgery Room
Practice management workshop focuses on financial operations and AI business applications.
Read more...
Aid Cuts Threaten Global Eye Care Progress
USAID closure leads retreat in development assistance.
Read more...
Supplement: ESCRS Clinical Trends Series: Presbyopia
Read more...
Debate: FS-LASIK or KLEx for Hyperopia?
FS-LASIK has more of a track record, but KLEx offers advantages.
Read more...
Four AI Applications Ready for Practice
Commercial offerings may save time, improve practice and research.
Read more...
Perioperative Medication Regimens for Cataract Surgery
Randomised controlled clinical trial results provide evidence-based guidance.
Read more...