Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate

Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia

Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate
Howard Larkin
Howard Larkin
Published: Tuesday, October 30, 2018
[caption id="attachment_13293" align="alignnone" width="1024"] MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, Jan Willem de Cler, head of surgical ophthalmology at Carl Zeiss Meditec and Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital discuss developing IOL technologies at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018[/caption] Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia, according to presenters at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018. However, designing successful accommodating IOLs remains daunting, said Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital. Several mechanical and flexible gel lens IOL designs have lost accommodative range over time due to capsule fibrosis, and lens mineralisation has developed as much as five years after implant, he noted. Detecting such problems lengthens development time, but is necessary, Dr Stevens added. “Given that we are implanting these lenses in younger people for refractive reasons, how much safety and efficacy data do you need, how long do you wait before you say ‘yes, that’s it?’” He believes electronic accommodating IOLs will be the solution, though battery technology must improve to provide a 40- to 50-year lifespan. Alcon are making progress on electronic accommodating IOLs and contact lenses, noted Laurent Attias, senior vice president for corporate development at the Novartis division. “The battery technology is not that far off. … we’ve seen improvements from four years to 20 years.” MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, is not willing to write off mechanical and shape-changing designs. Every technology has its advantages and limits and all are at an early stage, he said. “We need to push forward on every front.”
Tags: IOLs
Latest Articles
Simulators Benefit Surgeons and Patients

Helping young surgeons build confidence and expertise.

Read more...

How Many Surgeries Equal Surgical Proficiency?

Internet, labs, simulators, and assisting surgery all contribute.

Read more...

Improving Clinical Management for nAMD and DME

Global survey data identify barriers and opportunities.

Read more...

Are Postoperative Topical Antibiotic Drops Still Needed?

Cataract surgeons debate the benefits of intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis.

Read more...

Emerging Technology for Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus

Brillouin microscopy shows promise in clinical studies.

Read more...

Knowing Iris Repair: Modified Trifold Technique

Part eight of our series covers the modified trifold technique for large iris defects.

Read more...

It’s All About Biomechanics!

Increasing the pool of patients eligible for refractive surgery.

Read more...

Uncovering More Safe and Quick Options

Different strategies, such as PresbyLASIK, can offer presbyopes good outcomes.

Read more...

Topography-Guided PRK for Keratoconus

Improving visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.

Read more...

Defining AMD Treatment Protocol

Treatments trending to fewer injections for better results.

Read more...