Measuring IOL position for IOL power formulas

Intraoperative OCT allows precision of IOL position

Measuring  IOL position for IOL power formulas
Leigh Spielberg
Leigh Spielberg
Published: Wednesday, November 4, 2015

What is a primary difference between the various intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas?” asked Oliver Findl MD, of Vienna, Austria. “It is how they take into account the effective IOL position,” Dr Findl told a session of the XXXIII Congress of the ESCRS in Barcelona, Spain.

“According to a study on IOL power calculation, postoperative anterior chamber depth, and thus IOL position, is the number one cause of error. So how can we get a direct measurement of future IOL position?”

Dr Findl proposed intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a means to accomplish this. Intraoperative OCT gives the opportunity to double-check preoperative findings, and allows a precise prediction of the IOL position in the aphakic eye, he said.

He discussed the results of his study using Visante from Carl Zeiss, an anterior segment OCT that is attached to the operating microscope and provides continuous intraoperative OCT videos. He also noted that, although intraoperative aberrometry might have value, intraoperative changes such as the effect of the lid speculum must be taken into account. Further, aberrometry offers no prediction of IOL position.

In a study of 203 primarily short and long eyes, standard cataract surgery was performed and a capsular tension ring (CTR) was placed in the bag. Once the CTR had been placed, providing a taut, positionally stable capsular bag, the intraoperative OCT was used to measure the anterior chamber depth. The study compared the measurements provided by optical biometry (IOLMaster 500, Lenstar + ACMaster), autorefraction, subjective refraction and the intraoperative OCT.

“The best predictor of IOL position turned out to be the anterior capsule at the edge of the rhexis, with the CTR in place. This was even better than using the axial length,” reported Dr Findl.

Two different IOLs were used in the study: an open-loop IOL (Tecnis one-piece from AMO) and a plate haptic IOL (Asphina from Zeiss).

The study results suggest that inserting the OCT results into an IOL power calculation formula would greatly improve the value of the anterior chamber depth variable within the formula. The predicted OCT-based results compared favourably to those predicted by fourth-generation IOL power calculation formulas.

A future goal of Dr Findl’s would be to fuse intraoperative OCT measurements with ray tracing to further refine refractive outcomes, and to use the intraoperative OCT during corneal endothelial surgery.

 

Oliver Findl: oliver@findl.at

Latest Articles
Towards a Unified IOL Classification

The new IOL functional classification needs a strong and unified effort from surgeons, societies, and industry.

Read more...

Organising for Success

Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.

Read more...

Update on Astigmatism Analysis

Read more...

Is Frugal Innovation Possible in Ophthalmology?

Improving access through financially and environmentally sustainable innovation.

Read more...

iNovation Innovators Den Boosts Eye Care Pioneers

New ideas and industry, colleague, and funding contacts among the benefits.

Read more...

From Concept to Clinic

Partnerships with academia and industry promote innovation.

Read more...

José Güell: Trends in Cornea Treatment

Endothelial damage, cellular treatments, human tissue, and infections are key concerns on the horizon.

Read more...

Making IOLs a More Personal Choice

Surgeons may prefer some IOLs for their patients, but what about for themselves?

Read more...

Need to Know: Higher-Order Aberrations and Polynomials

This first instalment in a tutorial series will discuss more on the measurement and clinical implications of HOAs.

Read more...

Never Go In Blind

Novel ophthalmic block simulator promises higher rates of confidence and competence in trainees.

Read more...