Information Registration Programme Overview Satellite Education Programme Virtual Exhibitor Listing


All ePoster presentations will be available to view anytime throughout the Meeting in an Online Library

Search Abstracts by author or title


Discontinuation and non-publication of cataract surgery-related interventional clinical trials

Poster Details

First Author: N. Khanna USA

Co Author(s):    Y. Vaishnav   H. Moreira   M. Gallagher   T. Yilmaz           

Abstract Details


Although there are a multitude of cataract-based clinical trials that take place globally, a paucity of literature regarding the discontinuation and non-publication of such trials exists. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of non-publication in completed as well as discontinued interventional clinical trials as differentiated by both industry and academia.


Not Applicable


A retrospective, cross-sectional study of cataract surgery-based interventional clinical trials in between 1992-2020 was conducted. ?2 and Fisherï¾’s exact tests were used to determine any potential associations between trial characteristics and trial completion.


A total of 458 trials were evaluated in this study, 33% U.S.-based, with a 14-fold increase in the number of trials in the past fifteen years. Of the included trials, 88% were not published and 89% were completed; however, only 34% published results of their study on Devices and procedures accounted for 66% of the intervention types investigated. A total of 50.005 participants were enrolled in unpublished, completed trials; whereas 5.583 participants were enrolled in unpublished, discontinued trials. We found no statistically significant differences in the odds of nonpublication or discontinuation between industry and academia-sponsored trials (p=0.43, 0.10, respectively).


New policies and initiatives have helped usher in an era of improved methods for trial reporting; however, further action is needed to ensure that findings of all trials are shared in order to build a more comprehensive body of knowledge and decrease redundancy. Publication of inconclusive or negative results ensures that all research activities, regardless of outcome, contribute to a more robust, global medical literature.

Financial Disclosure:


Back to Poster listing