London 2014 Registration Visa Letters Programme Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2014 Exhibition Hotel Booking Virtual Exhibition Star Alliance
london escrs

Course handouts are now available
Click here


Come to London

video-icon

WATCH to find out why


Site updates:

Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.


Biometry results and outcomes in eyes with long and extreme axial lengths

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Session Details

Session Title: Cataract Surgery Outcomes

Session Date/Time: Tuesday 16/09/2014 | 08:00-10:30

Paper Time: 09:56

Venue: Capital Hall A

First Author: : S.Ti SINGAPORE

Co Author(s): :    P. Woon   S. Chee           

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To study the biometry accuracy and refractive outcome in eyes with long (27.0-30.0mm) and extreme (>30.0mm) axial lengths (AL), correlation with intraocular lens A-constants and comparison between SRK/T and Haigis lens formulas.

Setting:

Singapore National Eye Centre

Methods:

The charts of Chinese patients with long axial lengths (>27.0mm), no other preoperative ocular morbidities and had uneventful phacoemulsification with implantation of a low-diopter (D) intraocular lens (IOL; Alcon MA60MA or AMO AR40M) over 1 year (2012) were retrospectively reviewed. Main parameters assessed were 1) AL measured by Zeiss IOL Master or contact ultrasound (keratometry by Topcon auto kerato-refractometer), 2) A-constants, 3) IOL model (categorized into positive-, zero- and negative-D lens) and 4) mean absolute error (MAE= 1-month postoperative spherical equivalent (SE)–predicted SE). The formula used for lens power calculation was SRK/T. Results were correlated to AL (Pearson’s correlation) and statistically compared to Haigis formula (repeated ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results:

Results of 137 eyes of 112 patients (AL 27.0-30.0mm (n=44); AL >30.0mm (n=93)) were included. IOL categories: positive- D (n=72); zero-D (n=9); negative –D (n=42). A-constants used included both the standard and user group for laser interference biometry (ULIB) optimized A- constants. The MAE (n=123; SRK/T formula) was 1.14± 0.86D, and 91.1% had postoperative hyperopia (median+1.11D), with no significant correlation to AL. There was no significant difference in MAEs between IOL Master (n=97) and contact ultrasound techniques (n=26) (1.13±0.89D vs 1.14±0.74D, SRK/T formula, t-test, p=0.77). For the MA60MA IOL (n=88), ULIB optimized A- constants were significantly more accurate for low positive-D (MAE= 0.53±0.48D vs 1.29±0.96D, p<0.001) and negative-D IOLs (1.28±0.83D vs 2.03±0.63D, p=0.045) than standard A- constant. The Haigis formula more accurately predicted postoperative refractive error, with statistically lower MAE (MAE= 0.99±0.79D, p<0.001), and lower % postoperative hyperopia of 87% (median+0.89D). Differences in MAE obtained using SRK/T and Haigis formulae were significant only for AL >30mm (+1.28±0.9D and +1.06±0.86D respectively).

Conclusions:

In this cohort of long and extreme ALs, the MAE depended on IOL formula, A-constants used and ALs, with no difference in results derived from ultrasound biometry and IOL Master. The Haigis formula is more accurate than SRK/T formula at predicting refractive error in eyes longer than 30mm and should be the recommended choice. For IOL master, ULIB optimized A-constants for low-D IOL provided more accurate predictability of postoperative refractive error. Overall MAE was 1.14± 0.86D (median =1.1D), and 91.1% patients recorded hyperopia, suggesting that surgeons aiming for postoperative emmetropia should target at least myopia of ≥-1.1D.

Financial Interest:

NONE

Back to previous