London 2014 Registration Visa Letters Programme Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2014 Exhibition Hotel Booking Virtual Exhibition Star Alliance
london escrs

Course handouts are now available
Click here


Come to London

video-icon

WATCH to find out why


Site updates:

Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.


Accuracy of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculation using optical low coherence reflectometry

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Session Details

Session Title: Cat Surgery Equipment/inst/OVD

Session Date/Time: Tuesday 16/09/2014 | 16:30-18:00

Paper Time: 17:37

Venue: Boulevard B

First Author: : K.Yoon SOUTH KOREA

Co Author(s): :    T. Lee              

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare ocular biometry measured by optical low coherence reflectometry (Lenstar®) with that measured by current clinical instruments, evaluate the accuracy of refractive outcomes after cataract surgery and investigate the factors influencing intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using Lenstar® with and without formula optimization.

Setting:

Department of Ophthalmology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea

Methods:

A total of 100 eyes in 86 patients who received cataract surgery were included in this study. Corneal curvature was measured with manual keratometer, automated keratometer and Lenstar®, and axial length was measured with A-scan and Lenstar®. Mean absolute error (MAE) that subtract predictive refraction from postoperative refraction was compared between automated and manual keratometers with A-scan and Lenstar® with and without formula optimization. The factors affecting the accuracy of IOL power calculation by Lenstar® with and without formula optimization were analyzed.

Results:

The corneal power did not differ among instruments, whereas the axial length measurements were significantly longer in Lenstar® than in A-scan (23.37±1.13 vs. 23.20±1.13 mm; p<0.01). No significant differences were observed in MAE between the instruments. The percentage of MAE within 0.5D was higher in Lenstar® with optimization (62.7%) than without optimization (46.2%) (p=0.02). Without formula optimization, the MAE was larger in long or short axial lengths compared with normal axial lengths (p=0.03), while it was larger in low corneal powers when the formula was optimized (p=0.03).

Conclusions:

Optimizing IOL constants for Lenstar® biometry substantially improve refractive outcomes. The axial length may influence the accuracy of refractive outcomes using Lenstar® without formula optimization, and the corneal curvature affect the refractive accuracy using Lenstar® with formula optimization.

Financial Interest:

NONE

Back to previous