London 2014 Registration Visa Letters Programme Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2014 Exhibition Hotel Booking Virtual Exhibition Star Alliance
london escrs

Course handouts are now available
Click here


Come to London

video-icon

WATCH to find out why


Site updates:

Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.


Flap versus pocket-based procedures for corneal inlay implantation

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Session Details

Session Title: Presbyopic Corrections

Session Date/Time: Monday 15/09/2014 | 16:30-18:30

Paper Time: 17:10

Venue: Boulevard F (Level 1)

First Author: : D.Kent NEW ZEALAND

Co Author(s): :                  

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate and compare the visual performance and outcome stability for patients implanted with a small aperture intra-corneal inlay under a flap versus in a lamellar pocket.

Setting:

Fendalton Eye Clinic, Christchurch, New Zealand

Methods:

Retrospective comparative analysis of 6-month data from 123 patients implanted monocularly with a KAMRA inlay (AcuFocus, Irvine, CA) using either a flap- (N=93) or pocket-based (N=30) procedure. In the flap-based procedure the inlay was implanted under a 200-micron femtosecond laser flap immediately following a LASIK treatment. In the pocket-based procedures the inlay was implanted into a 200-250 micron femtosecond laser-created lamellar pocket either as a standalone procedure or with LASIK using a dual-interface technique. The manifest spherical equivalent refraction (MRSE), uncorrected near acuity (UNVA), uncorrected distance acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance acuity (BDVA) were evaluated pre-operatively and at 1, 3 and 6-months post-operatively. Distance visual acuity is represented in Snellen and near vision in Jaeger notation. Refractive stability and safety defined by loss of 2 or more lines of pre-operative BDVA are reported.

Results:

In flap patients, UDVA changed from 20/30 pre-operatively to 20/32 at 6-months (p = 0.51). In pocket patients, UDVA improved by a line from 20/40 pre-operatively to 20/30 at 6-months (p = 0.79). In flap patients, UNVA improved from J7 pre-operatively to J1 at 6-months (p <0.0001). In pocket patients, UNVA improved from J4 pre-operatively to J1 at 6-months (p = 0.01). At 6-months average MRSE was -1.23 D ± 0.60D in flap and -0.77D ± 0.67D in pocket patients respectively. At 6-months 8% of flap patients lost 2 or more lines of BDVA versus none of the pocket patients. 95% of flap and 100% of pocket patients had BDVA of 20/25 or better at 6-months respectively. 13.5% of flap patients experienced a hyperopic refractive shift of +1.00D or more at 6-months; none of the pocket patients experienced +1.00D or more shift over the same follow-up timeframe.

Conclusions:

Both flap- and pocket-based procedures provide similar significant improvements to near vision with minimal to no compromise to distance vision. However, the pocket-based procedures provide improved safety and refractive stability results over the 6-month period.

Financial Interest:

One or more of the authors... receives nonNONEmonetary benefits from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented., One or more of the authors... travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to previous