London 2014 Registration Visa Letters Programme Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2014 Exhibition Hotel Booking Virtual Exhibition Star Alliance
london escrs

Course handouts are now available
Click here


Come to London

video-icon

WATCH to find out why


Site updates:

Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.


ReLEx SMILE induces significantly less spherical aberration than wavefront optimised sub-Bowman’s LASIK for any given residual postoperative relative tensile strength

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Session Details

Session Title: SMILE for Myopia I

Session Date/Time: Sunday 14/09/2014 | 08:00-09:30

Paper Time: 08:30

Venue: Capital Hall B

First Author: : D.Reinstein UK

Co Author(s): :    T. Archer   M. Gobbe           

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To analyze spherical aberration induction in matched myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and sub-bowman’s femtosecond flap LASIK and correlate this to comparative relative postoperative corneal tensile strength.

Setting:

London Vision Clinic, London, UK

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of consecutive SMILE treated eyes using a standard spherical lenticule profile (6, 6.5 or 7mm optical zones) to matched LASIK eyes using wavefront guided-optimised profile on the Carl Zeiss MEL80 excimer platform (6mm zone). Ablation depth vs myopia treated for each of the employed profiles were plotted for comparison. For each eye corneal spherical aberration change (6mm) and total postoperative relative tensile strength [based on a previously published model (J Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;29(7):454-60) were calculated and plotted against myopia corrected.

Results:

Mean SEQ was -7.99±2.53D (-2.51 to -13.31) in the 6mm SMILE group (n=72), -5.77±1.83D (-2.63 to -11.19) in the 6.5mm SMILE group (n=69) and -3.95±1.34D (-1.65 to -8.31) in the 7mm SMILE group (n=170). Respectively for SMILE vs LASIK, mean optical zone was 6.70mm vs 6.08mm, mean tissue removal was 107μm vs 81μm, mean induced spherical aberration was 0.11μm vs 0.31μm and mean postop tensile strength was 73% vs 57%. The induced spherical aberration decreased as expected for larger SMILE optical zones; the regression line slope was 0.081 for 6mm, 0.059 for 6.5mm, and 0.030 for 7mm. Comparing LASIK and SMILE 6mm zone treated groups, the induced spherical aberration was similar (slope 0.074), but ablation depth was higher for LASIK (equivalent to a 6.25mm SMILE). SMILE with a 7mm optical zone induced approximately 1/3 of the spherical aberration of the LASIK group (eg for -10 corrections 0.1982 vs 0.5804-μm Z4,0) but leaving significantly greater relative postoperative tensile strength (eg 55% more for a -10 correction) despite consuming more tissue (27% for a -10 correction).

Conclusions:

Despite SMILE lenticule profiles being spherical, induction of spherical aberration in SMILE was lower than aspheric LASIK for equivalent tissue removal. In preserving stronger anterior stromal lamellae, SMILE optical zones can be safely increased to improve spherical aberration control while still leaving postoperative relative corneal tensile strength higher than for an equivalent modern aspheric LASIK procedure.

Financial Interest:

One or more of the authors... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to previous