London 2014 Registration Visa Letters Programme Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2014 Exhibition Hotel Booking Virtual Exhibition Star Alliance
london escrs

Course handouts are now available
Click here


Come to London

video-icon

WATCH to find out why


Site updates:

Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.


Correction of pseudophakic refractive errors with a sulcus-fixated supplementary IOL: 5 year follow-up

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Session Details

Session Title: IOL technology/New IOLs etc.

Session Date/Time: Saturday 13/09/2014 | 08:30-10:30

Paper Time: 09:44

Venue: Boulevard A

First Author: : G.Kahraman AUSTRIA

Co Author(s): :    F. Prager   J. Wiesinger   B. Wetzel   M. Amon     

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To investigate the outcomes of a hydrophilic acrylic, foldable, single piece, sulcus-fixated supplementary posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) (Sulcoflex Aspheric, Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited, UK) after up to 5 years of follow-up.

Setting:

Academic Teaching Hospital of St. John, Vienna, Austria

Methods:

This prospective, non-randomised, study included 113 eyes that received a secondary IOL (Sulcoflex Aspheric, 653L) to correct residual refractive error, post cataract surgery. Clinical and refractive outcomes were evaluated. All IOLs were implanted with an injector through a 2.75 mm clear cornea incision in the ciliary sulcus. Postoperative examinations were performed after 1 and 6 months, and a further follow-up occurred between 1 ,3 to 5 years. Assessments included uncorrected (UCVA) and best-corrected (BCVA) visual acuity, specular microscopy, and scheimpflug photography.

Results:

Surgeries were performed without any complication in all cases. There were no patient complications at the final post-operative visit. The mean follow-up was 3.47 years. (range 6 mon – 5.3 years ). The mean age was 58.3 years (range 33 – 89 years). No intra- or postoperative complications were detected, and target refraction (± 0.25 dpt ) was achieved in all cases, with stable refractions. Flare values were lower than the values measured after standard cataract procedures. Centration through slit lamp assessment at all post-operative visits was excellent. Intraocular pressure was within the normal range at all visits. No iris chafing was documented and in all cases a good distance was observed between the iris and the Sulcoflex Pseudophakic Supplementary IOL. 3 eyes had shown slight pigment dispersion anterior surface of the supplementary IOL. Similarly, a good distance was observed between the supplementary IOL and the primary implant. No additive IOL exchange was necessary.

Conclusions:

The Sulcoflex Aspheric IOL was well-tolerated in all study eyes. Secondary implantation of the Sulcoflex IOL in the ciliary sulcus was a safe and predictable option for patients with pseudophakic refractive errors

Financial Interest:

One or more of the authors... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, One or more of the authors... travel has been funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to previous