Lisbon 2017 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites OneWorld Travel Discount
escrs app advert


Search Title by author or title

Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of trifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses

Poster Details

First Author: Y.Akova TURKEY

Co Author(s):    N. Yesilirmak   B. Aslan                 

Abstract Details


The purpose of this study is to compare the visual outcomes of Panoptix trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and the multifocal ReSTOR �.0 D IOL�â�€�™s.


Bayindir Hospital, Ankara, TURKEY


This prospective, non-randomized comparative study included 50 eyes in 38 patients underwent cataract surgery and multifocal intraocular lens implants. 30 eyes received multifocal Restor�.0 D IOL, 20 eyes received Panoptix IOL. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA).


Postoperative UDVA was 0.05 and 0.04 logMAR in the multifocal Restor �.0 D IOL and Panoptix trifocal IOL groups, respectively (p=0.825); postoperative CDVA was 0.01 and 0.02 logMAR, respectively (p=0.66); DCIVA was 0.19 and 0.52 logMAR, respectively (p=0.000); and DCNVA was 0.05 and 0.09 logMAR, respectively (p=0.001). In both groups, there was an improvement in the spherical equivalent and UDVA (p<0.05). The Panoptix lenses exhibited better behavior for intermediate vision, according to the defocus curve and a shorter reading distance than the ReSTOR � group.


Good visual quality for long and short distances provided by both lenses. Panoptix exhibited a better intermediate vision.

Financial Disclosure:


Back to Poster listing