London 2014 Registration Visa Letters Programme Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2014 Exhibition Hotel Booking Virtual Exhibition Star Alliance
london escrs

Course handouts are now available
Click here


Come to London

video-icon

WATCH to find out why


Site updates:

Programme Updates. Programme Overview and - Video Symposium on Challenging Cases now available.


Posters

Search Abstracts by author or title
(results will display both Free Papers & Poster)

Accuracy and comfort of measurement of intraocular pressure by tonopen xl vs. goldman and contact pneumotonometer in patients with primary open angle glaucoma

Poster Details

First Author: N.Kashchenko USA

Co Author(s):    E. Chynn   T. Dovzhuk           

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To compare accuracy and comfort of measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tonopen-XL (TPXL) vs. two “gold standards”: Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT), and contact pneumotonometer (CPT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Setting:

Prospective comparative study involving a single glaucoma subspecialty private practice.

Methods:

IOP of 17 POAG patients (34 eyes; 6 male (35.3%) and 11 female (64.7%)) was measured with Tonopen XL (Medtronic, USA), Goldman applanation tonometry (Haag-Streit, Switzerland), and contact pneumotonometry (Medtronic “classic model 30”, USA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using ultrasonic pachymeter (DGH, USA). Patients graded their subjective comfort level on a numerical scale (1-10).

Results:

Mean CCT was 566 ± 46 μm. Mean IOP (mmHg) for TPXL was 12.5 ± 3.0 (range, 5-18) vs. 14.6 ± 3.3 for GAT (range, 9-24) and 14.7 ± 3.4 (range, 9.5-25.5) for CPT. Average difference between mean IOP for TPXL and GAT was -2.15; TPXL and CPT -2.25; GAT and PTC was -0.1. TPXL readings were strongly correlated to both GAT (r=0.73, p<0.001) and CPT (r= 0.69, p<0.001), CPT and GAT were highly correlated (r=0.89, p<0.001). Mean comfort scores were 6.8 for TPXL, 7.64 for GAT, and 7.70 for CPT; no significant differences in comfort scores between devices

Conclusions:

In a population of patients with POAG, Tonopen-XL was shown to be a very accurate method of measuring IOP, as it correlated highly with two “gold standards” for IOP measurement, namely Goldman and contact pneumotonometry. Tonopen-XL read consistently about 2 mm Hg below both Goldman and contact pneumotonometry; clinicians may wish to correct for this difference. Goldman and contact pneumotonometry readings were nearly identical, which supports the use of each as a “gold standard.” All three methods had good comfort scores without any significant differences.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE

Back to Poster listing